• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC TIBIA IMPLANT PSC INSERT, SZ 5, 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC TIBIA IMPLANT PSC INSERT, SZ 5, 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Model Number SPECIFIC DEVICE NOT REPORTED
Medical Device Problem Codes Naturally Worn (2988); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Failure of Implant (1924); Synovitis (2094); Joint Laxity (4526); Insufficient Information (4580); Joint effusion (4849)
Date of Event 08/14/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Pending investigation.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported via legal documentation the patient had a left knee replacement on (b)(6)2012.Approximately 7 years and 9 months after the initial procedure the patient had a left knee revision on (b)(6) 2020.There is no other patient demographic or medical history available.There is no information on the surgical procedure or patient outcome.There is no device return.There are no photos or other images of the device provided.No additional information is available.The patient has filed a short-form complaint in a multidistrict litigation titled in re: exactech polyethylene orthopedic products liability litigation, mdl no.(b)(4), and pending in the eastern district of (b)(6).Per the transfer order creating this multidistrict litigation, ¿plaintiffs¿allege that their knee or hip replacement devices¿failed prematurely because of degradation of the device¿s polyethylene component, which resulted in the premature removal (or planned removal) of the prosthesis at issue.¿ because the patient has filed a suit in this multidistrict litigation, the patient appears to allege that the patient was injured as a result of premature wear of an exactech polyethylene device.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported via legal documentation the patient had a left knee replacement on (b)(6) 2012 due to osteoarthritis.Approximately 7 years and 9 months after the initial procedure the patient had a left knee revision on (b)(6) 2020.Revision op report postoperative diagnosis: foreign body synovitis, left knee with moderate poly wear of insert.The surgeon noted that the left leg showed a 3+ effusion with mild mid-range laxity.Significant synovitis noted and some nodular synovitis consistent with poly wear.The parapatellar area was noted to have the same and this was debrided.The medial and lateral gutters were also debrided with basically a total synovectomy performed.Femoral and tibial components were stable and no sign of loosening.Previously placed 9 mm poly was removed; some wear along the medial border of the post and somewhat along the medial posterior polyethylene surface.No significant breakdown noted.There is no other patient demographic or medical history available.There is no device return.There are no photos or other images of the device provided.No additional information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D10.Concomitants: 02-010-01-0250 - logic femoral ps cem left sz 5 2023531.02-012-45-5040 - lgc tibial fit tray cem sz 5f/4t 2349510.200-02-38 - three peg patella 38mm 2251677.Further information and/or investigation results will be provided within 30 days of receipt.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The following sections were updated: h6.The following sections were corrected: h6.The reason for the revision reported cannot be confirmed from the information provided but may be the result of prosthesis wear or due to inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall.Potential contributions of user and patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as the devices were not available for evaluation and images and radiographs were not provided.Should additional relevant information be obtained, a follow-up mdr will be submitted accordingly.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LOGIC TIBIA IMPLANT PSC INSERT, SZ 5, 9MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH INC.
2320 nw 66th ct
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
kate jacobson
3523771140
MDR Report Key17745094
Report Number1038671-2023-02267
Device Sequence Number5282094
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10885862173713
UDI-Public10885862173713
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K110547
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2012
Device Explanted Year2020
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/21/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/02/2020
Device Model NumberSPECIFIC DEVICE NOT REPORTED
Device Catalogue Number02-012-44-5009
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/28/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/20/2023
Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/14/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/31/2023
11/21/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/02/2012
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device A
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
Z-0021-2022
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
SEE H10.; UNK.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-