• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number CI-1400-02H
Medical Device Problem Codes Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198); Electrostatic Discharge (2149); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 08/30/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The recipient reportedly experienced overly loud sound issues.External equipment was exchanged; however, the issue did not resolve.The recipient's device was explanted.The recipient was reimplanted with another advanced bionics cochlear device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A device history review was performed at the request of the nca and no anomalies were noted.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend, that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Advanced bionics considers the investigation into this reportable event as closed.The external visual inspection revealed sliced silicone overmold on the top cover, as well as a severed electrode which are believed to have occurred during revision surgery.Visual inspection also revealed a dented top cover.The device passed photographic imaging inspection.System lock could not be obtained at any spacing.The electrode condition prevented an electrical test from being performed.The device passed some of the electrical tests performed.The device passed the mechanical tests performed.The failure of this device is attributed to a short from a power node to the case ground at the analog chip.It is believed that electrostatic discharge (esd) led to an overload voltage, damaging structures on case ground node inside the analog integrated circuit.This ultimately caused the device to cease functioning.A corrective action was implemented.This older device configuration is not currently manufactured.This is the final report.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC
28515 westinghouse place
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
heidi white
28515 westinghouse place
valencia, CA 91355
MDR Report Key17764940
Report Number3006556115-2023-01605
Device Sequence Number7093781
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier07630016816260
UDI-Public(01)07630016816260(11)150625(17)170630
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
P960058
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/30/2017
Device Model NumberCI-1400-02H
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date09/18/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/23/2023
05/13/2024
07/31/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/25/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age9 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-