|
The complaint device has been discarded. as a result, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and device malfunction cannot be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803. this report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date. this report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report. if certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: capsular contracture.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a primary breast augmentation surgery with implantation of a 775cc mentor memorygel xtra breast implant prosthesis.Post-operatively, the patient's left breast was observed to be sitting high during a follow-up visit with a medical professional.Additionally, the healthcare professional suggested the patient may have had a hematoma of the left breast as she stated she had bruising of the left breast after the implantation surgery.On a secondary follow-up visit, the patient was diagnosed with baker grade iii capsular contracture of the left breast.As a result, the patient underwent unilateral removal and replacement with a 775cc mentor memorygel xtra breast implant on (b)(6) 2023.
|