|
|
| Catalog Number |
VCP486H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Wound Dehiscence (1154); Discomfort (2330)
|
| Date of Event |
09/01/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a c-section on (b)(6) 2023 and suture was used for pfannenstiel fascia closure.Six days post-op, the patient reported discomfort.The patient returned to the operating room with wound dehiscence.During the re-operation, the abdomen was rinsed out.The suture was removed and the fascia was closed with a different suture.The subcutaneous and subcuticular closure was subsequently done.Upon the re-operation, it was found that the knots were intact to the left and right but the suture was broken more or less in the middle of the closure.The patient is currently in good health and recovering well.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.¿ trade name - irgacare® ¿ active ingredient(s) ¿ triclosan ¿ dosage form ¿ suture/solid/parenteral ¿ strength ¿ = 275 g/m a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.H6 component code: g07002.Device not returned attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure what tissue dehisced? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? how was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? how was the suture tied (square knot or multiple knots one end)? were there any patient stress factors that precipitated the event of suture breakage post op? did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement and during any re-operation? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? if applicable, will product be returned? if so, please provide the return date and tracking information.Surgeon¿s name?.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.The returned sample determined that it was received, thirty-six unopened samples pertain to the product code vcp486h.As per the sampling plan, a visual inspection was performed on the samples, and no defects were found on the packages.The packets were opened, and the swage and attachment area were noted as expected.The sutures were dispensed without problems and examined along of the strand and no anomalies were observed during the evaluation.Also, a functional test was performed using instron equipment and tensile force was above the minimum requirements.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure.Unknown.What tissue dehisced? fascia.What was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? normal.How was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? continuous.How was the suture tied (square knot or multiple knots one end)? yes.Were there any patient stress factors that precipitated the event of suture breakage post op? no, patient was not performing any exercise, only caring for the baby.Did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement and during any re-operation? no, not during the initial operation.When patient was re admitted, it was found that the suture was broken in the middle of the wound, and the knots were intact.Other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? no.What is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? surgeon thinks it might be a batch problem, since nothing like this was seen before.What is the patient's current status? patient is well, wound seems to have healed completely.If applicable, will product be returned? product could not be returned, as it was disposed of with the re operation.If so, please provide the return date and tracking information.N/a.Surgeon¿s name? prof (b)(6).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|