|
Adverse event (ae) assessment: ae assessor contacted client twice to obtain accurate information regarding the device.The client was a poor historian and became upset with repeated questions.Client is reporting she is currently using the v-go 40 device with novolog insulin and has type 1 diabetes.Client is reporting recurrence of her blood sugars are dropping to the 40's at night, the v-go is giving her too much insulin.She has been on v-go for 4 months.She was in the hospital twice 2-3 months ago with low blood sugar readings.Client cannot state date of admissions, diagnosis for admission or medical changes to insulin at discharge.She does state being on the v-go for these admissions.Client reports she has a follow up appointment with her health care provider (hcp) in 3 months.Client reports she knows it is the v-go giving to much insulin because the needle goes in sideways, it is crooked and not straight when removed.No devices are saved for collection.Client reports she wears the device on the back of her arms, rotating daily.She denies any issues applying the device, skin is soft, no lumps or hard spots.No issues are reported with the needle start button.Ae assessor was unable to assess if the client uses the needle release button to remove the device.Additional information on skin preparation prior to v-go placement is also unknown.A blood sugar reading of 40 is serious.The client is reporting reoccurrence six times.The client is reporting she is not using the bolus clicks and is taking the v-go off at night to avoid low blood sugar readings.The ae assessor recommended and stressed importance that the client contact her health care provider and report her serious, reoccurring low blood sugar readings with the v-go 40 device.Advised she cannot wait to see her provider in 3 months.Suspect the client is receiving more insulin then required to manage her diabetes.Due to limited information, it is possible the device contributed to the reported events, serious low blood sugar reading with reoccurrence.
|