|
SYNTHES GMBH T-PAL SPACER APPLICATOR HANDLE; INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION DEVICE WITH BONE GRAFT, LUMBAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
03.812.001 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Use of Device Problem (1670); Compatibility Problem (2960)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
09/08/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: d9: complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation but has yet to be received.E3: reporter is a j&j employee.H3, h6: the investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in japan as follows: it was reported that this was an unknown surgery with tpal products performed on (b)(6) 2023.During surgery, the cage could not be released from the holder.In the surgery, the cage was attached to the holder and inserted properly.The lock was released and the preparation for the rotation was done according to the surgical technique.After that, the surgeon hammered and confirmed that the cage was placed in the proper position.The surgeon then tried to release the cage from the holder, but the dial of the holder could not be turned, and the cage could not be released.Therefore, the surgeon opened and used another new cage and holder because the surgeon thought the event might have been caused by an operational error.The new cage was placed and released without any problems.The surgery was completed successfully with no surgical delay.Patient status/ outcome: stable.No further information is available.Remarks: (b)(4) are involved with the same event.(b)(4) (synthes spine): instrument/holder.(b)(4) (depuy spine): cage.This report is for one (1) applicat out shaft.This is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: part: 03.812.001, lot: 8303805, release to warehouse date: 23 april 2013, manufacturing site: werk hägendorf, expiration date: n.A.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished article lot and no non-conformances were identified.The product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned device found that the applicat out shaft has stuck in the connection body an applicator knob, disassembling problems are most probably caused due to this condition.According to the received information the device was misused.Functional test was performed and was able to replicate the reported condition, due to the devices does not disassemble as intended.A dimensional inspection was not performed since it was not applicable to the complaint condition.The observed condition of the device was consistent with a random component failure that may have been caused by exposure to unintended forces.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the applicat out shaft would contribute to the complained device issue.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause can be attributable to unintended use based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Drawing/specifications reviewed current and manufactured revisions were reviewed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: h3, h4, h6: the device has been received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|