| Catalog Number |
201101210 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Limb Fracture (4518); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
| Date of Event |
09/14/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the reamer head snapped off into femur during reaming.A window was made in femur to remove.Surgery was delayed due to the reported event 40-60 minutes.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : according to the information received, "reamer head snapped off into femur during reaming.Window made in femur to remove.Part of consigned set, tray and serial number unknown.Tagged as damaged and ready for investigation/ collection".The product was not returned to depuy synthes, however photos were provided for review.See attachments (b)(4).The photo investigation revealed that (b)(4) , actis reamer sz 0 and 1 tip is broken and fragment is also visible from the photos provided.No further evidence can be observed from the photo to determine the root cause.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the (b)(4) , actis reamer sz 0 and 1 would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : according to the information received, "reamer head snapped off into femur during reaming.Window made in femur to remove.Part of consigned set, tray and serial number unknown.Tagged as damaged and ready for investigation/ collection".The product was not returned to depuy synthes, however photos were provided for review.See attachments (b)(4).The photo investigation revealed that (b)(4) , actis reamer sz 0 and 1 tip is broken and fragment is also visible from the photos provided.No further evidence can be observed from the photo to determine the root cause.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the (b)(4), actis reamer sz 0 and 1 would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information provided, "reamer head snapped off into femur during reaming.Window made in femur to remove.Part of consigned set, tray and serial number unknown." the device 201101210 actis reamer sz 0 and 1 (lot number ng101450) was returned to depuy synthes of evaluation.Visual examination confirmed the reamer was was fractured proximal of the larger cutting features, at the distal end of the small constant diameter portion of the shaft.Stereomicroscopic evaluation of the fracture surfaces revealed beach marks consistent with fatigue crack propagation.Multiple initiations regions were apparent around the surface of the reamer consistent with rotating bending fatigue.Additionally, several cracks were apparent proximally and distally to the fracture surface, indicative of several fatigue cracks growing simultaneously with the primary fracture.This suggests low stress high cycle fatigue fracture.No evidence of material or manufacturing defects was observed.Hardness measurements were taken for the reamer with results of 40 hrc, which is typical of 17-4 ph stainless steel in the h900 condition, and meets the requirement of 40 hrc minimum, as designated on the engineering drawing.Therefore, the reamer was cyclically loaded in rotating bending, likely due to normal repeated slightly off-axis reaming under power, resulting in low stress high cycle fatigue crack initiations and ultimate propagation to failure.No evidence of material or manufacturing defects was observed that could have contributed to the failure of this component.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).Where the product and lot code was provided, a manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.The patient had to have eto during the index surgery which lead to a fracture propagation and subsequent revision surgery.This could all be considered a complication for the reamer breaking during the initial surgery.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|