| Model Number |
D012 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Pacing Problem (1439); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Electric Shock (2554)
|
| Date of Event |
09/04/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that there is a concern for a suspected inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) and shock therapy from this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd).Boston scientific technical services (ts) performed an analysis in which it was determined that there may be inappropriate therapy for a supraventricular tachycardia.It was also noted that therapy exhaustion occurred; ts recommended programming enhancements.The device remains in service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that there is a concern for a suspected inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing (atp) and shock therapy from this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd).Boston scientific technical services (ts) performed an analysis in which it was determined that there may be inappropriate therapy for a supraventricular tachycardia.It was also noted that therapy exhaustion occurred; ts recommended programming enhancements.The device remains in service.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received indicating that this device was explanted due to normal battery depletion.This device was returned.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The returned device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual examination of the device header and case noted no anomalies.Dimensional analysis of the header was completed.Each port measured as expected.The device was then exposed to simulated heart load conditions, and the defibrillation, pacing, and sensing functions were tested.Impedance testing was completed, and all measurements were within normal limits.The device operated appropriately with no interruptions in therapy output at the returned programmed settings.A series of electrical tests was also performed, and again, normal device function was observed.Analysis did not identify any device characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|