|
Section a2, a4 and a5: per regulation eu 2016/679 (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed in the initial surgery.Section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3 - other (81): the intraocular lens (iol) was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review and possible product return and evaluation, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Additional information: section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: product testing could not be performed since the device was not returned for evaluation.Evaluation the photograph provided found that the alleged suspect intraocular lens (iol) had a detached haptic.No further evaluation could be performed.Conclusion: the complaint issue haptic detached was identified during photo evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.As a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|