|
(b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Trade name: irgacare®, active ingredient(s): triclosan, dosage form: suture/solid/parenteral, strength: = 2360 g/m.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.H6 component code: g07002 device not returned.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure please confirm the dates reported in the file: was the initial procedure on (b)(6) 2023? if no, please provide correct date.Is the event date of (b)(6) 2023 correct? if no, please provide correct date.What is the quantity of sutures involved in this event? what was the initial approach for the index surgical procedure? (open, laparoscopic or other)? on what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? was the fixation loop secured to tissue at the initiation of suture use during the index procedure? was at least one reverse stitch performed prior to closure? please describe the patient manifestations of the reported infection (location, severity, appearance, systemic or local infection).Please provide the onset date/time of infection from the initial surgical procedure.Were there any pre-existing signs/symptoms of active infection prior to this surgical procedure? did the patient receive any prophylactic antibiotics pre-, intra- or post-operation? were cultures performed? if so, please provide the results.Please describe any medical/surgical intervention performed including medication name and results.Were any pre-op cleansing procedures changed recently? if yes, please describe did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? if applicable, will product be returned? if so, please provide the return date and tracking information.--received information as following from sales rep via phone today.After investigation, the patient was a 45-year-old male who underwent open humerus fracture repair in hospital on (b)(6) 2023 (the surgical side was unknown).The surgeon used sxmp1b101 for sewing the skin and subcutaneous tissue in a continuous suturing manner during surgery, which went smoothly.On (b)(6) 2023, the patient returned to the hospital for reexamination, and complained of wound redness and heat with pus discharge.The doctor found wound infection during examination.The doctor performed debridement, removed the original suture at the wound and replaced it with a new suture (with specific product information unknown) to sew the wound.Then the patient's symptoms were gradually improved.The doctor cultured the removed suture for bacteria and cultured staphylococcus aureus.No subsequent adverse events were reported.Other information requested is unknown.
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an open humerus fracture repair on (b)(6) 2023 and a barbed suture was used on the skin and subcutaneous tissue.Post-op, on (b)(6) 2023, the patient returned to the hospital for reexamination, and complained of wound redness and heat with pus discharge.The doctor found wound infection during examination.The doctor performed debridement, removed the original suture at the wound and replaced it with a new suture to sew the wound.Then the patient's symptoms were gradually improved.The removed suture was placed in petri dish by hospital, and staphylococcus aureus was cultured.No subsequent adverse events were reported.Additional information was requested.
|
|
(b)(4).This is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional h6 investigation findings: c22 - photo review.Additional h3 investigation summary: this is an analysis for a photo submitted to ethicon for evaluation.During the visual analysis, the following was observed: the photo shows a closed aluminum package with product code sxmp1b101.The image is not clear to determine the failure mode or the reported condition.Based on the photo review, the event describe is not confirmed, however no conclusion or root cause could be determined.Hands on device analysis may provide the additional evidence necessary to confirm the root cause of the reported event.Because the instrument was not returned our evaluation is limited.As part of ethicon quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|