|
A1: patient identifier: requested, not provided.A2: age & date of birth: requested, not provided.A3: patient sex: requested, not provided.A4: weight: requested, not provided.A5: ethnicity: requested, not provided.A6: race: requested, not provided.D6a: implanted date: device was not implanted.D6b: explanted date: device was not explanted.E3: occupation: requested, unknown.A review of the device history record of the product code and lot number combination was conducted with no findings.The actual device was not available for product evaluation.The complaint cannot be confirmed for deformation of the sheath tip because the sample was not returned for assessment.The exact root cause could not be determined.Historically, deformations of the sheath tip occur during insertion, as the destination sheath tip is atraumatic and designed to prevent damage to the artery if faced with resistance.Review of the device history record (dhr) showed there were no issues noted during manufacture of the product that could have contributed to this complaint condition.Currently no action is recommended since this risk evaluation is within the predetermined limits in the design failure mode and effects analysis (dfmea).
|