MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC RETRACTA DETACHABLE EMBOLIZATION COIL; KRD DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR

Model Number	N/A
Medical Device Problem Code	Separation Failure (2547)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event	09/27/2023
Type of Reportable Event	Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a retracta detachable embolization coil would not deploy during an unknown procedure on a trauma patient.The catheter was flushed prior to deployment.An attempt was made to deploy the coil in the 4-6mm internal iliac using a torque device; however, the coil would not deploy from the delivery wire.The physician then removed the device from the patient.A new coil was then used to complete the procedure successfully.The complaint device was tested following removal from the patient and the coil was able to be deployed.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unchanged, unknown, or unavailable.Investigation ¿ evaluation it was reported that a retracta detachable embolization coil would not deploy during an unknown procedure on a trauma patient.The catheter was flushed prior to deployment.An attempt was made to deploy the coil in the 4-6mm internal iliac using a torque device; however, the coil would not deploy from the delivery wire.The physician then removed the device from the patient.A new coil was used to complete the procedure successfully.The complaint device was tested following removal from the patient, and the coil was able to be deployed.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures for the device were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.In response to this incident, cook completed a review of the product device master record (dmr) and concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The dhr was also reviewed and records no relevant nonconformances.A database search for complaints on the reported lot found no additional complaints reported from the field.Cook concluded that no nonconforming product from this lot exists in house or in the field.Cook reviewed product labeling.The current instructions for use [t_mwcer_rev6] state the following: "under fluoroscopic visualization, slowly advance the delivery wire until the entire length of coil exits the distal end of the catheter.Ensure that the junction remains positioned just inside the catheter tip.Note: advancing the delivery wire slowly allows the junction to be seen more easily and reduces the risk of damaging it.Note: if significant resistance is encountered during coil advancement, do not continue advancing.Retract the delivery wire slightly, then gently re-advance it.If there is still significant resistance, withdraw the delivery wire from the catheter and try using a new coil with a shorter length." the information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, and ifu suggests that the device was not manufactured out of specification, and that there are no nonconforming devices in house or out in the field.Based on the information provided, no return device, and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that component failure unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies contributed to this incident.The physician was able to detach the coil during testing outside of the patient.It is possible that junction zone of the coil was not positioned just inside of the catheter, allowing the coil to stay attached; but this could not be definitively confirmed.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.

• Brand Name: RETRACTA DETACHABLE EMBOLIZATION COIL
• Common Device Name: KRD DEVICE, EMBOLIZATION, VASCULAR
• Manufacturer (Section D): COOK INC; 750 daniels way; bloomington IN 47404
• Manufacturer (Section G): COOK INC; 750 daniels way; bloomington IN 47404
• Manufacturer Contact: jason crouch ; 750 daniels way; bloomington, IN 47404 ; 8123392235
• MDR Report Key: 17900851
• Report Number: 1820334-2023-01360
• Device Sequence Number: 16985778
• Product Code: KRD
• UDI-Device Identifier: 10827002341897
• UDI-Public: (01)10827002341897(17)270822(10)14913325
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: FL
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K151676
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): N
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: User Facility,Company Representative
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Other
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 03/05/2024

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: No
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: Yes
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Model Number: N/A
• Device Catalogue Number: MWCER-35-7-8
• Device Lot Number: 14913325
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Initial
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 09/28/2023
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 02/26/2024
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 10/09/2023
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 03/05/2024
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 08/22/2022
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Concomitant Medical Products and Therapy/Usage Dates: 5FR.C2 GLIDE CATHETER.
• Patient Sex: Unknown