MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO; SURGICAL MESH

Catalog Number	5955800
Medical Device Problem Codes	Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Abscess (1690); Adhesion(s) (1695); Inflammation (1932); Hernia (2240); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event	08/09/2016
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st mesh on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st mesh.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct brand name and pma/510(k) #.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-feb-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4 (catalog no, lot no, expiry date, udi no), d.6b, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected field: d1 (brand name) and g4 (pma/510(k) #).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st mesh on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st mesh.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: 0on (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient was diagnosed with large ventral hernia thereby underwent robotic repair with the implant of ventralight st using echo ps.Per operative notes, ¿the defect in periumbilical and at the site of colostomy were encountered.A circular ventralight st using echo ps was placed to cover both the defects and tacked using optifix tacker.¿ on (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral incisional hernia, small bowel obstruction thereby underwent laparoscopic repair.Per operative notes, ¿adhesion to the sac was separated.The hernia defect was closed using sutures and the previous mesh was identified inferior to the defect.¿ on (b)(6) 2022 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incisional hernia, abscess secondary to mesh thereby underwent laparoscopic to open repair with the removal of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the incisional hernia sac had multiple pockets of defect was reduced.There was a inflammatory reaction around the mesh due to pus.An abscess cavity tracked relating to mesh was removed.¿.

• Brand Name: VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO
• Common Device Name: SURGICAL MESH
• Manufacturer (Section D): DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick RI 02886
• Manufacturer (Section G): BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544; san geronimo industrial park; lot #1, road #3, km 79.7; humacao PR 00791
• Manufacturer Contact: andrew topoulos ; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick, RI 02886 ; 4018258495
• MDR Report Key: 17903057
• Report Number: 1213643-2023-094052
• Device Sequence Number: 15409557
• Product Code: FTL
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00801741031779
• UDI-Public: (01)00801741031779(17)170328(10)HUZB1684
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: PA
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K130968
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2015
• Device Explanted Year: 2022
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Other,Consumer
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Non-Healthcare Professional
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 08/06/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 03/28/2017
• Device Catalogue Number: 5955800
• Device Lot Number: HUZB1684
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Initial
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 10/06/2023
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 07/16/2025
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 10/10/2023
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 08/06/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 02/15/2015
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 44 YR
• Patient Sex: Male