| Catalog Number |
72202599 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/26/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an arthroscopy, the wrong awl was employed to create access in the bone.Therefore, when the twinfix ultra anchor was tapped, it broke off.The procedure was completed with non-significant surgical delay using a back-up device.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: corrected information in d4 (lot number).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The insertion device was returned with the anchor and suture strings still installed.The anchor is fractured at the proximal end of the suture window with the distal portion of the anchor held in place by the suture strings.There is biological debris on the returned items.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the material specifications found that the raw material strength and storage requirements are specified and each lot must be accompanied by a material certificate of analysis.The root cause has been associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|