|
Section a2, a4 and a5: unknown/ asked but not available.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section e1: initial reporter: email address: unknown/not provided.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 10/16/2023.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned and, no issues with the haptics could be observed.A scratch on the optic of the lens, near the spare tire could be observed.Conclusion: the complaint issue of haptic detached was not confirmed.The other observed issue found during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.The complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|