|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL BREAST IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
3545350 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/14/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: rupture mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a female who underwent a breast augmentation primary with a mentor memorygel, 350cc silicone prosthesis experienced left-sided breast rupture intraoperatively.The report indicated that during placement of the implant inside the pocket, broke completely.No adverse event, nor any patient consequences were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Suspect device received on december 07, 2023 device evaluation completed on december 12 , 2023: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor then conducted a visual inspection, leak testing, and microscopic examination of the returned device.During the visual analysis of the returned sample siltex uhp 350cc, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed.Leak testing was performed, according to the mentor procedure, and it revealed an area of missing material extended to a rent on the anterior view, measuring approximately 0.1 cm x 0.1 cm and 0.5 cm respectively.A microscopic examination was performed on the edges of the missing material and rupture, and no parallel striations were found in an area of the tear.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformances were identified.Based on the information currently available, a visual evaluation of the missing material indicates that the implant could have been damaged by an instrument during implantation.The product insert data sheet cautions to not allow cautery devices or instruments, such as scalpels, suture needles, hypodermic needles, hemostats, adson forceps, drain trocar, cannulas, or scissors to contact the device during the implantation or other surgical procedures.The cause of the rupture in the remaining area of the tear could not be identified.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.No corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|