| Model Number |
IPN919796 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
09/15/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that: the line was stitched in - it slipped through the holder,(associated (b)(4)) happened twice on 1 patient (associated to (b)(4)), there was an issue the week before, (associated this complaint).The patient's condition did not deteriorate due to immediate replacement of line, the patient was not harmed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that: the line was stitched in - it slipped through the holder,(associated (b)(6)) happened twice on 1 patient (associated to (b)(6)), there was an issue the week before, (associated this complaint) the patient's condition did not deteriorate due to immediate replacement of line, the patient was not harmed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).The customer returned one unopened acute hemodialysis set for analysis.This kit is assumed to be a representative sample.The kit was opened to further inspect the components.Visual analysis revealed that the catheter wing clip was secure to the catheter body and could not be easily separated.No other defects or anomalies were observed on the returned juncture hub nor on the wing clip.Visual inspection of the actual device could not be performed as it was not returned for evaluation.Force was applied to the catheter wing clip to determine whether it could be easily removed.The wing clip was observed to be fixed in place and was not able to be removed.Functional inspection of the actual device could not be performed as it was not returned for evaluation.A device history record review was performed, and no relevant findings were identified.The customer report of a catheter migration could not be confirmed through complaint investigation of the returned sample.Inspection of the returned representative catheter revealed no obvious anomalies or defects.The suture wing clip was observed to be secure.A device history record review was performed with no evidence to suggest a manufacturing related root cause.Based on these circumstances, and without the actual sample returned for analysis, the probable root cause could not be determined.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for complaints of this nature.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Udi related data quality updates only section d.4.-(udi)# corrected to (b)(4).The customer returned one unopened acute hemodialysis set for analysis.This kit is assumed to be a representative sample.The kit was opened to further inspect the components.Visual analysis revealed that the catheter wing clip was secure to the catheter body and could not be easily separated.No other defects or anomalies were observed on the returned juncture hub nor on the wing clip.Visual inspection of the actual device could not be performed as it was not returned for evaluation.Force was applied to the catheter wing clip to determine whether it could be easily removed.The wing clip was observed to be fixed in place and was not able to be removed.Functional inspection of the actual device could not be performed as it was not returned for evaluation.A device history record review was performed, and no relevant findings were identified.The customer report of a catheter migration could not be confirmed through complaint investigation of the returned sample.Inspection of the returned representative catheter revealed no obvious anomalies or defects.The suture wing clip was observed to be secure.A device history record review was performed with no evidence to suggest a manufacturing related root cause.Based on these circumstances, and without the actual sample returned for analysis, the probable root cause could not be determined.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for complaints of this nature.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that: the line was stitched in - it slipped through the holder, (associated (b)(4)) happened twice on 1 patient (associated to tc# 1900108107), there was an issue the week before, (associated this complaint) the patient's condition did not deteriorate due to immediate replacement of line, the patient was not harmed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|