• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. LINX 1.5 16 BEAD US; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. LINX 1.5 16 BEAD US; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LXMC16
Medical Device Problem Codes Device Appears to Trigger Rejection (1524); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Dysphagia/ Odynophagia (1815)
Date of Event 01/01/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a linx device was a year ago.The patient had severe regurgitation and paraoesophageal hernia before surgery.Did well, was dilated twice for dysphagia with temporary relief.Patient noted return of symptoms 4-6 wks ago, imaging showed a discontinuous device.They are unsure if device will be replaced, still implanted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 10/18/2023.B3: only event year known: 2023.D6a: exact implant date is unk.Assumed first day of the month and first month of the year.Lot number was received and dhr is pending review.When the review is completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent with a summary of the evaluation.Photo images were received.Any additional information obtained from the photo evaluation will be included as part of the product investigation.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what was the exact date of implant? was dysphagia the only symptom the patient was experiencing? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: (b)(4).Was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? when and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? is the patient currently taking steroids / immunosuppressive drugs? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4); date sent: 11/15/2023.Photo analysis: an x-ray image of the device in vivo was reviewed by a medical safety officer.As per medical safety officer: "the barium esophagram reviewed demonstrates a discontinuous links device located below the diaphragm." the mechanism/cause of failure is unknown as a hands-on analysis of the device is necessary to determine the cause of failure.No further investigation can be completed at this point.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 20866 number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent; 4/23/2024.Additional information received: surgeon indicated patient underwent explant on (b)(6) 2024 and no replacement device was implanted.Patient is doing well post operatively.Spoke with patient today who also indicated she is doing well.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 8/13/2024.D4: udi: as the serial number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.The device upon which this medwatch is based has been received, however, the evaluation is not yet complete.Any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 10/3/2024.Investigation summary: a linx device with a visible weld ball that disconnected from a male bead case was returned to the analysis site.The link length and tensile force measurements were found to meet the applicable specifications during device analysis.The remaining device characteristics, excepting the visible weld ball, show no anomalies for a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure, tooling marks were noted in some beads.The device was scanned using computer tomography (ct), optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy.The male bead case through-hole at the separation was measured which was greater than the specification.The male bead case was concentric.The overall appearance of the surface of the male bead case through hole didn¿t exhibit gross loss of shape.The top view of the diameter of the exposed weld ball was measured.This diameter is within the specification.The weld ball was concentric with the respect to the wire.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LINX 1.5 16 BEAD US
Common Device Name
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4545 creek road
cincinnati OH
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
4545 creek rd.
cincinnati, OH 45242
3035526892
MDR Report Key17957531
Report Number3008766073-2023-00206
Device Sequence Number20584772
Product Code LEI
UDI-Device Identifier00855106005363
UDI-Public00855106005363
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P100049
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/03/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/24/2022
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC16
Device Lot Number20866
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/06/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/14/2023
04/22/2024
08/04/2024
09/25/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/18/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/15/2023
04/23/2024
08/13/2024
10/03/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/24/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-