| Catalog Number |
MC1312P |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/24/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a surgeon had multiple roi-c cages that fractured or cracked intra-operatively.Two cages fractured at level c7/t1 after inserting the anchoring plates.They were each removed and replaced with a new cage.The third cage cracked and the surgeon elected to leave it in place.The surgeon proceeded to the c6/7 level and installed the first cage, but it was found to have fractured after the first anchoring plate was installed.The cage was again removed and replaced with a new cage and the surgeon elected not to install the anchoring plates at that level.There was a delay of three hours to the procedure without reported patient impacts.This is report one of four for this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a surgeon had multiple roi-c cages that fractured or cracked intra-operatively.Two cages fractured at level c7/t1 after inserting the anchoring plates.They were each removed and replaced with a new cage.The third cage cracked and the surgeon elected to leave it in place.The surgeon proceeded to the c6/7 level and installed the first cage, but it was found to have fractured after the first anchoring plate was installed.The cage was again removed and replaced with a new cage and the surgeon elected not to install the anchoring plates at that level.There was a delay of three hours to the procedure without reported patient impacts.This is report one of four for this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrections in d4: lot number.A follow-up report will be sent if additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrections in d4: expiration date & udi number.Additional information in h4 and h6: component, investigation type, findings, and conclusions.Device evaluation: the returned device matches the information in the complaint file and was examined.Visual inspection revealed the cage is fractured.Root cause: a definitive root cause cannot be determined with the information provided.This event could possibly be attributed to unknown patient or surgical factors.Dhr review: per dhr review, the part was likely conforming when it left zimvie control.Device usage: this device is used for treatment.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report, a follow-up report will be sent.Reference reports: 3004788213-2023-00083 through 3004788213-2023-00086.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a surgeon had multiple roi-c cages that fractured or cracked intra-operatively.Two cages fractured at level c7/t1 after inserting the anchoring plates.They were each removed and replaced with a new cage.The third cage cracked and the surgeon elected to leave it in place.The surgeon proceeded to the c6/7 level and installed the first cage, but it was found to have fractured after the first anchoring plate was installed.The cage was again removed and replaced with a new cage and the surgeon elected not to install the anchoring plates at that level.There was a delay of three hours to the procedure without reported patient impacts.This is report one of four for this event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|