| Model Number |
102957 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Infusion or Flow Problem (2964); No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/29/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the centrimag began to have low flow alarms with a flow of 0 lpm with no precipitating event and no accompanying chattering visualized in the drainage tubing.Despite adjustment of the speed, and exchanging of the flow probe, flow above 0 liters per minute (lpm) was unable to be achieved.It was decided by the care team to exchange the blood pump due to the concern that a clot was causing the impedance in flow.After exchanging to a new centrimag blood pump, flow above 0 lpm was still unable to be achieved.Assessment of the tubing most proximal to the patient was done and separation of blood and plasma was visualized.The patient was started on an inotrope (dobutamine), centrimag support was stopped, and the patient was de-cannulated due to presumed clotting of the single-site double lumen cannula inserted in the right internal jugular vein.Prior to the event, patient was systemically anticoagulated and within a therapeutic range.Duration of event was approximately 20 minutes.Due to hemodynamic stability, the patient was not re-cannulated, and support was not resumed at that time.Additionally, the care team further assessed and flushed the original centrimag blood pump and noted there to be no clots formed inside the blood pump.25000u of heparin was given intravenous push throughout the process.Patient remained in the intensive care unit, stable and awaiting heart transplant.Related regulatory reference report mfr # 3003306248-2023-07171; 3003306248-2023-07170;.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No further information was provided.A supplemental report will be submitted once the manufacturer¿s investigation is completed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was additionally reported that the thrombus was identified in the protek duo cannula that was used.The patient was stable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section a4: patient weight was requested but was not provided.Section d4: serial number was requested but was not provided.Manufacturer's investigation conclusion: the centrimag flow probe, serial number unknown, was evaluated due to the reported event of the centrimag system alarming with a low flow alert and displaying 0 lpm for the flow value.Per additional information, thrombus was identified in the cannula that was used which caused the event to occur, and no issues regarding the centrimag flow probe were reported.No products were returned for analysis, no log files were associated with the reported event, and the patient¿s status was stated to be stable.The reported thrombus will be addressed via the centrimag blood pump¿s investigation.The serial number of the centrimag flow probe was not provided.The 2nd generation centrimag system operating manual (rev.M, section 4 "warnings and precautions") warns "one additional 2nd generation centrimag primary console, motor and flow probe are required as backup system in the immediate vicinity of each patient whenever the centrimag or pedivas blood pump is used.The backup console must be connected to the backup motor and to the backup flow probe, have a battery charge sufficient for at least one hour of operation, be connected to ac power (except during transport) and be immediately available should the main console, motor or flow probe experience a malfunction." no further information was provided.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|