|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Product analysis # (b)(4): as found condition- the concerto device was returned for analysis within a shipping box, within a sealed plastic biohazard pouch; within an opened concerto outer carton and within an opened concerto inner pouch.The instant detacher used during the event was not returned for analysis.Visual inspection/damage location details: the actuator interface was found securely attached to the coupler tube.There is no evidence of detachment attempts using an instant detacher at this location.The break indicator was found unbroken.There is no evidence of manual detachment attempts at this location.No damages were found with the remaining concerto pusher.The coin was found still against the lumen stop.Blood was found under the ptfe shrink tubing and within the lumen stop.No damages or irregularities were found with the shield coil.The implant coil was found still attached to the pusher.The implant coil was found to be damaged.No damages or irregularities were found with the coin.The lumen stop was found damaged (ovalized).No damages were found with the coin.Dried blood was found on the coin.Testing/analysis ¿ an in-house instant detacher was used to test detachment, which failed to detach the implant coil.The pusher was broken, and the release wire was retracted but found to be stuck.Under magnification, the ptfe shrink tubing was removed, and the blood was dissolved.The release wire was retracted, and the coin exited the lumen stop.The implant coil became detached.Conclusion - based on the customer report and device analysis, the customer report of "non-detachment" was confirmed.It is likely the cause of the non-detachment is the blood found within the lumen stop, on the coin and under the jacket causing the coin to become stuck within the lumen stop.The implant detached with no issues once the blood was dissolved during analysis.The lumen stop was also found damaged, indicative that the coin was jammed within the lumen stop.This potentially could have contributed towards the resistance.The implant coil was found damaged, possibly caused by advancing against resistance or handling after retracted back out.As the instant detacher used during the event was not returned for analysis, any contribution of the instant detacher to the non-detachment could not be assessed.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|