|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Additional information: e1 investigation ¿ evaluation it was reported that a type 3 endoleak was discovered on a zenith flex with spiral-z technology aaa endovascular graft iliac leg.The patient was returning post initial procedure for a 30-day computed tomography angiography (cta) follow up.The cta revealed a type 3 endoleak, as it appeared that a hole was in the fabric of the device.It was noted that there was no evidence of an endoleak on the final run during the initial placement procedure.An additional intervention was needed to reline the graft to correct the endoleak.The patient is currently asymptomatic and was not hospitalized.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, drawing, device history record (dhr), quality control procedures, specifications, manufacturing instructions (mi), and instructions for use (ifu) of the complaint device were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned for investigation; therefore, no physical examination could be conducted.However, medical imaging was provided by the customer for expert review.An infrarenal aaa and left cia aneurysm are treated using a main body graft, an ipsilateral graft on the right, and a contralateral graft on the left.At 5 weeks postop, there is a type 3b endoleak in the aaa sac from a defect at the mid segment of the zsle graft.The defect appears to be near a stent peak immediately below the contralateral limb junction where the zsle graft lumen immediately expands from 10 mm within the limb to 13 mm just below it.This could be due to excessive inflation below the limb junction while balloon molding this segment.The cause cannot be definitively determined, however, from the imaging provided.The endoleak was successfully localized and treated on subsequent intervention with re lining of the zsle graft.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhrs for the reported complaint device lot and the related subassembly lots revealed no relevant non-conformances.A database search revealed no additional complaints for the reported lot number.Evidence provided by the customer, complaint history, dhr, device failure analysis, manufacturing documents, and verification testing, suggests that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu t_zaaasz_rev4 packaged with the device contains the following in relation to the reported failure mode: "4 warnings and precautions 4.1 general ¿ additional endovascular interventions or conversion to standard open surgical repair following initial endovascular repair should be considered for patients experiencing enlarging aneurysms, unacceptable decrease in fixation length (vessel and component overlap) and/or endoleak.An increase in aneurysm size and/or persistent endoleak or migration may lead to aneurysm rupture.¿ patients experiencing reduced blood flow through the graft limb and/or leaks may be required to undergo secondary interventions or surgical procedures.4.2 patient selection, treatment and follow-up ¿ zenith spiral-z iliac artery distal fixation site greater than 10 mm in length and 7.5-20 mm in diameter (measured outer wall to outer wall) is required.Theses sizing measurements are critical to the performance of the endovascular repair.¿ successful patient selection requires specific imaging and accurate measurements; please see section 4.3, pre-procedure measurement techniques, and imaging.4.3 pre-procedure measurement techniques and imaging ¿ clinical experience indicates that contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomographic angiography (cta) with 3-d reconstruction is the strongly recommended imaging modality to accurately assess patient anatomy prior to treatment with the zenith spiral-z aaa iliac leg.If contrast-enhanced spiral cta with 3-d reconstruction is not available, the patient should be referred to a facility with these capabilities.Lengths ¿ all patients should be advised that endovascular treatment requires life-long, regular follow-up to assess their health and the performance of the endovascular graft.Patients with specific clinical findings (e.G., endoleaks, enlarging aneurysm or changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft) should receive enhanced follow-up.Specific follow-up guidelines are described in section 12, imaging guidelines and postoperative follow-up.¿ after endovascular graft placement, patients should be regularly monitored for perigraft flow, aneurysm growth or changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft.At a minimum, annual imaging is required, including: 1) abdominal radiographs to examine device integrity (separation between components or stent fracture) and 2) contrast and non-contrast ct to examine aneurysm changes, perigraft flow, patency, tortuosity, and progressive disease.If renal complications or other factors preclude the use of image contrast media, abdominal radiographs and duplex ultrasound may provide similar information.4.4 device selection ¿ strict adherence to the zenith spiral-z aaa iliac leg ifu sizing guide is strongly recommended when selecting the appropriate device size (table 10.5.1).Appropriate device oversizing has been incorporated into the ifu sizing guide.Sizing outside of this range can result in endoleak, fracture, migration, device infolding or compression.4.5 implant procedure ¿ appropriate procedural imaging is required to successfully position the zenith spiral-z aaa iliac leg and assure accurate apposition to the vessel wall.¿ do not bend or kink the delivery system.Doing so may cause damage to the delivery system and the zenith spiral-z aaa iliac leg graft.¿ inaccurate placement and/or incomplete sealing of the zenith spiral-z aaa iliac leg within the vessel may result in increased risk of endoleak, migration or inadvertent occlusion of the internal iliac arteries.¿ fluoroscopy should be used during introduction and deployment to confirm proper operation of the delivery system components, proper placement of the graft, and desired procedural outcome.¿ avoid damaging the graft or disturbing graft positioning after placement in the event re-instrumentation (secondary intervention) of the graft is necessary.5.2 potential adverse events ¿ aneurysm enlargement ¿ aneurysm rupture and death ¿ claudication (e.G., buttock, lower limb) ¿ endoleak ¿ endoprosthesis: improper component placement; incomplete component deployment; component migration; component separation from another graft component; suture break; occlusion; infection; stent fracture; graft material wear; dilatation; erosion; puncture; perigraft flow; and corrosion ¿ surgical conversion to open repair 7.1 individualization of treatment additional considerations for patient selection include, but are not limited to: ¿ patient¿s age and life expectancy ¿ co-morbidities (e.G., cardiac, pulmonary, or renal insufficiency prior to surgery, morbid obesity) ¿ patient¿s suitability for open surgical repair ¿ patient¿s anatomical suitability for endovascular repair ¿ patient¿s ability to tolerate general, regional, or local anesthesia ¿ iliofemoral access vessel size and morphology (minimal thrombus, calcification and/or tortuosity) should be compatible with vascular access techniques and accessories of the delivery profile of a 14 french to 16 french vascular introducer sheath 8 patient counseling information ¿ all patients should be advised that endovascular treatment requires life-long, regular follow-up to assess their health and the performance of their endovascular graft.Patients with specific clinical findings (e.G., endoleaks, enlarging aneurysms or changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft) should receive enhanced follow-up.Specific follow-up guidelines are described in section 12, imaging guidelines and postoperative follow-up.¿ patients should be counseled on the importance of adhering to the follow-up schedule, both during the first year and at yearly intervals thereafter.Patients should be told that regular and consistent follow-up is a critical part of ensuring the ongoing safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment of aaas.At a minimum, annual imaging and adherence to routine postoperative follow-up requirements is required and should be considered a life-long commitment to the patient¿s health and well-being.¿ physicians must advise all patients that it is important to seek prompt medical attention if they experience signs of limb occlusion, aneurysm enlargement or rupture.Signs of graft limb occlusion include pain in the hip(s) or leg(s) during walking or at rest or discoloration or coolness of the leg.Aneurysm rupture may be asymptomatic, but usually presents as: pain; numbness; weakness in the legs; any back, chest, abdominal or groin pain; dizziness; fainting; rapid heartbeat or sudden weakness.Physicians should refer patients to the patient guide regarding risks occurring during or after implantation of the device.Procedure-related risks include cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, bowel and bleeding complications.Device-related risk include occlusion, endoleak, aneurysm enlargement, fracture, potential for reintervention and open surgical conversion, rupture, and death (see section 5.1, observed adverse events and section 5.2, potential adverse events).The physician should complete the patient i.D.Card and give it to the patient so that he/she can carry it with him/her at all times.The patient should refer to the card anytime he/she visits additional health practitioners, particularly for any additional diagnostic procedures (e.G., mri).12 imaging guidelines and postoperative follow-up 12.1 general ¿ all patients should be advised that endovascular treatment requires lifelong, regular follow-up to assess their health and the performance of their endovascular graft.Patients with specific clinical findings (e.G., endoleaks, enlarging aneurysms or changes in the structure or position of the endovascular graft) should receive additional follow-up.¿ patients should be counseled on the importance of adhering to the follow-up schedule, both during the first year and at yearly intervals thereafter.Patients should be told that regular and consistent follow-up is a critical part of ensuring the ongoing safety and effectiveness of the endovascular treatment of aaas.¿ physicians should evaluate patients on an individual basis and prescribe follow-up relative to the needs and circumstance of each individual patient.The minimum requirement for patient follow-up (described in the instructions for use for the zenith aaa device that was used) should be maintained even in the absence of clinical symptoms (e.G., pain, numbness, weakness).Patients with specific clinical findings (e.G., endoleaks, enlarging aneurysm or changes in the structure or position of the stent graft) should receive follow-up at more frequent intervals.¿ the combination of contrast and non-contrast ct imaging provides information on aneurysm diameter change, endoleak, patency, tortuosity, progressive disease, fixation length and other morphological changes.¿ duplex ultrasound imaging may provide information on aneurysm diameter change, endoleak, patency, tortuosity, and progressive disease.In this circumstance, a non-contrast ct should be performed to use in conjunction with the ultrasound.Ultrasound may be a less reliable and sensitive diagnostic method compared to ct." based on the information provided, expert review of medical imaging provided by the facility, and the results of our investigation, cook could not establish a definitive cause for the reported failure with the information provided.The image reviewer stated, ¿the failure could be due to excessive inflation below the limb junction while balloon molding this segment.The cause cannot be definitively determined, however, from the imaging provided." the appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|