| Catalog Number |
ZILBS-635-10-6 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Failure to Advance (2524)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/28/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
When the wire guide (olympus/visiglide2 0.025inch angled) was inserted into the tip of zilbs-635-10-6, the user felt something was wrong (it was not inserted smoothly), so he stopped using it.The procedure was completed by using another size (10-8)(lot#: unknown). since this facility uses this product on a regular basis, we do not see any problem with its usage.1 general questions for all complaints.1-1 (if any damages were confirmed prior to use)was the package damaged? no.1-2 (if any damages were confirmed prior to use)how was the device stored? 1-3 was a sphincterotomy or balloon dilation performed prior to use of the stent device? no.1-4 was post-dilation performed after the placement of the stent? no.1-5 what brand of endoscope was used with the device? olympus/tjf-260v 1-6 what was the target location for the complaint device? common bile duct 1-7 was the device flushed through both flushing ports before the procedure, as per ifu? yes 1-8 details of the wire guide used (name, diameter, hyrdophyllic)? 1-9 was resistance encountered when advancing the wire guide or delivery system to the target location? no.1-10 how did the physician deal with this resistance? 1-11 was the patient's anatomy tortuous? no.1-12 did the tip of the delivery system cross the target location? no.1-13 did the user pull the handle toward the hub during deployment and delivery system was not pushed during deployment? yes.1-14 was the stent being placed through the side wall of a previously placed stent? no.1-15 was the elevator in the down position during deployment? yes.1-16 are images of the device of procedure available? no.7 difficulty advancing over the wire guide: 7-1 details of the wire guide used (diameter, hydrophyllic, make)? 7-2 was the stent device flushed through the flushing port(s) before the procedure, as per ifu? yes.7-3 was the patient¿s lesion heavily calcified / anatomy tortuous? no.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #k163018.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) # k163018.Cancellation report is being submitted due to additional information received on 30-jan-2024.Fda mdr reporting not required.No reporting malfunction precedence exists for this complaint event for this product family.No risk/ low risk of failure mode indicates no potential for serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Cancellation report is being submitted due to additional information received on 30-jan-2024.Fda mdr reporting not required.No reporting malfunction precedence exists for this complaint event for this product family.No risk/ low risk of failure mode indicates no potential for serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|