|
The manufacturer was informed of an early explant of a perceval valve (unknown model, size m) that occurred on (b)(6) 2023.Reportedly, the prosthesis was implanted on (b)(6) 2019 and explant occurred because of severe stenosis and resultant moderate regurgitation.The perceval valve was replaced with a bioprosthesis from a different manufacturer (edwards lifesciences inspiris, size m) with no reported complications.
|
|
The manufacturer was informed of an early explant of a perceval s valve size m occurred on (b)(6)2023.Reportedly, the prosthesis was implanted on (b)(6)2019 and explant occurred because of severe stenosis and resultant moderate regurgitation.The perceval valve was replaced with a bioprosthesis from a different manufacturer (edwards lifesciences inspiris, size m) with no reported complications.As per additional information received, the patient had the following risk factors and clinical conditions : dislipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus type ii on oral treatment and was obese at the time of implant.As reported, early functionality of the perceval valve was good but a rapid deterioration of haemodynamics was detected with patient presenting with shortness of breath on exertion at the time of re-do surgery.
|
|
The manufacturing and material records for the perceval heart valve, model # icv1209, s/n # (b)(6), as they pertain to the reported event, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this valve had been manufactured and controlled in accordance with the specifications for a model # icv1209 perceval heart valve at the time of manufacture and release.The explanted valve was returned to the manufacturer for analysis.The gross examination revealed intrinsic and vegetating calcifications in all leaflets and pannus overgrowth on the inflow skirt of the valve.The stent and the skirt were covered by fibrous pannus that on the inflow side protruded 2-3 mm into the lumen, narrowing the annulus, and contributing to the reported valve stenosis.X- rays showed intrinsic calcifications in all leaflets.The top of all posts were covered by fibrous pannus that grew on the free edges of the leaflets, contributing to valve stenosis.The free edge of two of the leaflets was outflow bent near the posts due to fibrous pannus, thus contributing to the observed prosthetic insufficiency.The pericardium of all three leaflets was thicker than normal mostly near the posts, and was almost stiff due to intrinsic and vegetating calcifications.Small calcified thrombus depositions were visible on some portions of the inflow surfaces.Scars were visible where intrinsic calcifications became extrinsic.A histo-morphological analysis was performed which showed no evidence of endocarditis in the returned valve.In conclusion, leaflets calcification, detected with visual, x-ray and histological analyses, caused stiffening and led to progressive valve stenosis.Pannus tissue overgrowth into the inflow lumen also contributed to valve stenosis.Aortic insufficiency likely resulted from inadequate leaflet coaptation caused by calcification of the leaflets and by fibrous pannus.As reported in the scientific literature, structural dysfunction is the major cause of failure of bioprosthetic heart valves and the principal underlying pathologic process is cuspal calcification.It should be noted that, based on the information retrieved regarding the clinical history, the patient involved in the reported event presented several risk factors for structural valve deterioration (i.E.Dislipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus type ii).Ultimately, it should be considered that structural valve deterioration is listed as a possible adverse event in the perceval ifu.The event is, therefore, a known inherent risk of the device.
|