|
After removing the red seal from the handle, the doctor was able to move the handle about 7 cm, in the direction of shrinking the monoplate and opening the prosthesis.At this moment, the auxiliary physician reported resistance in the handle and on the x-ray we could not see the prosthesis coming out of the catheter.The auxiliary physician returned the handle to the initial position and even then, no movement was seen on the x-ray.It was then that he decided to force the handle against the auxiliary table, in an attempt to get the prosthesis out of the catheter, but the handle broke.In the image and video it is possible to observe the shrinkage of the handle without the prosthesis having left the catheter.This file captures the user error of the user forcing the handle against the auxiliary table in an attempt to get the prosthesis out of the catheter.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Pma/510(k) # k163018.Device evaluation the zilbs-635-10-8 device of lot number c1821927 involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.As per image provided, device is partially visible- cannula appears to be kinked.This file addresses the user error of forcing the handle against the auxiliary table resulting in the kink observed in the cannula.Manufacturing records: prior to distribution all devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional inspection to ensure device integrity.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal any discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint issue.Review historical data: the review of relevant manufacturing records confirms the failure mode has not previously occurred for this work order.Instructions for use and/or label: there is evidence to suggest the user did not follow the instructions for use (ifu0065).Instructions for use (ifu0065) states the following: "take care not to kink the device during use.", "do not excessively torque the device¿ and "following stent placement, if resistance is met during the withdrawal of the delivery system, carefully remove the delivery system and wire guide as a unit".From the information provided it is known that the user forced the handle against the auxiliary table, in an attempt to get the prosthesis out of the catheter.Image review: an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause analysis: a definitive root cause of the user error was determined.As noted in the description of event, the user forced the handle against the auxiliary table, in an attempt to get the prosthesis out of the catheter.As previously mentioned, the ifu instructs users to take care not to kink the device during use, to not excessively torque the device and if resistance is met during the withdrawal of the delivery system, to carefully remove the delivery system and wire guide as a unit.Forcing the handle against the auxiliary table would have exerted sufficient force on the device to cause the kinking observed on the cannula in the image provided and would not be considered safe and proper use of the device.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu with respect to the intended use of the device, they have not taken care to not to kink the device during use.User/use error complaints are considered foreseen misuse.It is unknown how the device will perform outside of instructions for use and/or labelling requirements.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu and/label.Confirmation of complaint: complaint is confirmed based on visual and/or functional inspection.Corrective action/correction: complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential similar events.Summary of investigation: according to the initial reporter, after removing the red seal from the handle, the doctor was able to move the handle about 7 cm, in the direction of shrinking the monoplate and opening the prosthesis.At this moment, the auxiliary physician reported resistance in the handle and on the x-ray could not see the prosthesis coming out of the catheter.The auxiliary physician returned the handle to the initial position and, no movement was seen on the x-ray.The handle was forced against the auxiliary table, in an attempt to get the prosthesis out of the catheter, but the handle broke (kinked).Confirmed quantity of 01 device, confirmed used.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation findings conclude a definitive root cause was established.The user has not complied with the requirements of the ifu.As noted in the description of event, the user forced the handle against the auxiliary table, in an attempt to get the prosthesis out of the catheter.As previously noted, the ifu instructs users to take care not to kink the device during use.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential similar events.
|