|
It was reported that the device runs hot.There was no harm or adverse event for patient, operator or third party reported.No further information received.Update avoe 25-oct-2023, further information was provided that no harm for patient, operator or third party occurred.The surgery was finished successfully with a new device with the same part number.It was not necessary to do a second surgery.
|
|
Event description: it was reported that the device runs hot.The reported event was confirmed.The manufacturer evaluation revealed the device got significantly warmer than normal after approx.30 seconds.Further it was observed that the handpiece stopped during operation or did not start when switching from clockwise to counterclockwise rotation.The motor presented with sligth running noises which were caused by damaged bearings.The device was dissassembled and the sensor magnet was found twisted resulting from a failing adhesive for the sensor.The adhesive connection was already improved in april 2023, however the device was manufactured prior to this change.The improvement of the adhesive connection between sensor and sleeve in april 2023 was assessed as no change in the device design, but an adjustment in the manufacturing process.Based on the evaluation report created on the defective ar-300 handpiece, the plausible cause for the heating of the device at the customer is due to a wrong commutation magnet positioning.If, due to external factors, its magnetic field is not aligned with the magnetic field of the rotor magnet, the motor would run with less efficiency and leads to a decreased torque and rotational speed of the handpiece.The decreased efficiency also leads to the delta of electric energy being introduced through the battery being dissipated as heat.This would gradually warm up the handpieces housing.Depending on the severity of the displacement, the surgeon would recognize immediately the absence of mechanical power.While using the handpiece, the outer body would gradually warm up.If the surgeon continues to use the handpiece regardless, the temperature would continue to rise until causing discomfort holding the handpiece.By the time the user is not able to hold the handpiece anymore due to discomfort, temperatures are reached that are not yet able to damage the handpiece, as much higher temperatures would be needed.Therefore, it is extremely unlikely for this failure mode to cause any additional, thermic damage to the equipment and additionally harm patient or user.
|