• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 09/27/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4 and a5: unknown asked but not available.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation as the lens remain implanted in the eye.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the tecnis simplicity eyhance pre-loaded intraocular lens (iol) was fractured per surgeon which was not related to use error.No medical or surgical intervention was required.Another lens of same model and diopter was implanted.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes section d9: returned to manufacturer on: november 6, 2023 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint handpiece was received with the plunger rod overriding the lens.The complaint cartridge was received with the lens stuck inside of the cartridge and with the cartridge tip bulging around the lens.Further inspection of the cartridge revealed that there was not viscoelastic residue distributed throughout the length of the cartridge, suggesting that an inadequate amount of ovd/bss may have contributed to the complaint issue.The lens module was opened and, no marks that would indicate that the plunger rod advanced incorrectly could be identified.The handpiece was disassembled and, the assembly was inspected, no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue could be identified.Inspection of the lens inside of the cartridge revealed that one haptic was detached.The lens could not be retrieved from the cartridge; therefore, no further product evaluation could be performed.Conclusion: the complaint issue "lens damaged" was not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key18034382
Report Number3012236936-2023-02727
Device Sequence Number8213691
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731653
UDI-Public(01)05050474731653(17)250812
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/12/2025
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0150
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/22/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/30/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/12/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-