• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/05/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a4 and a5: per regulation eu 2016/679 (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Section d6a - implant date: not applicable.The intraocular lens was inserted and removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b - explant date: not applicable.The intraocular lens was inserted and removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section e1 - telephone number:(b)(6).Section h3 - other (81): the intraocular lens (iol) was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review and possible product return and evaluation, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was defective.Through follow-up we learned that the iol was damaged on the optic plate, with a deep "crack" extending from the point of insertion of one haptic to the center of the plate.The iol was remove and replaced with a new lens.No additional information has been received.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9 - device available for evaluation? yes section d9 - date returned to manufacturer: 14-nov-2023 section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.The suspect handpiece was received with the plunger rod fully advanced, and ophthalmic viscosurgical device (ovd) residue was present in the cartridge.The lens was received taped to gauze; it was cleaned, and visual inspection found a tear at the lens edge.No further issues were identified, and no further evaluation was performed.The complaint issue of lens damaged was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key18035760
Report Number3012236936-2023-02622
Device Sequence Number12829149
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474635852
UDI-Public(01)05050474635852(17)260207
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryIT
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/07/2026
Device Model NumberDCB00
Device Catalogue NumberDCB0000085
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/05/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/14/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date10/30/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/07/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-