|
This legal event is being reported as serious injury due to the reported recurrence with surgical intervention.The lot associated with this event was not reported and remains unknown; therefore an internal investigation into the device history records could not be performed.No strattice devices were returned for evaluation.Based on the limited information, including no identification of the lot number, and without relevant patient factors, a relationship between the event and the strattice could not be determined.Due to the legal process, if additional information is made available during legal proceedings, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
This is follow up#1 to report on 07/dec/2023, pmqa received notification from legal that the plaintiff profile form was received associated with this event.As per the ppf form, the patient underwent an ¿incisional hernia¿ repair and was implanted with strattice device lot sp100183-149 on (b)(6) 2015.The patient underwent an "exploratory laparotomy, lysis of adhesions, explantation of residual mesh, repair of recurrent incisional hernia with mesh, and placement of incisional prevena wound vac (nondurable)¿ on 07/mar/2019.As per the ppf form, the patient claims the implantation and failure of the mesh caused ¿pain, recurrence, adhesions, placement of wound vac, abscess, emotional injuries with and without treatment, infection, inflammation, and intervention and mesh removal surgery¿.The form lists the conditions that were treated were ¿pain, recurrence, adhesions, placement of wound vac, abscess, emotional injuries with and without treatment, infection, inflammation, and intervention and mesh removal surgery¿ with approximate dates of treatment as 07/mar/2019.The ppf form also indicates the patient was implanted with a non-abbvie device, "bard soft mesh¿ lot# hucy0480 during the (b)(6) 2019 procedure.As reported in the initial: limited information was reported through a legal event that a patient was implanted with strattice on (b)(6) 2013.The form also indicates that on an unspecified date, the strattice implant had been ¿removed or revised¿.No information was provided on the indication for the initial surgery or the reason for the removal or revision.
|
|
This legal event is being reported as serious injury due to the reported recurrence with surgical intervention.A review of the device history record for strattice lot sp100183 has been initiated.If any new, changed or corrected information is noted, a supplemental report will be submitted.No strattice devices were returned for evaluation.This is a known potential adverse event addressed in the product labeling.Without relevant patient factors, a relationship between the strattice and this event could not be determined.Due to the legal process, if additional information is made available during legal proceedings, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|