|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for this medwatch, a supplemental medwatch report will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: device history record review: a device history review was performed and no non-conformances were identified related to the reported condition.Device evaluation: the actual device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed and it was determined that the device falling apart - unattached, identified during service and evaluation was confirmed.However, an assignable root cause was not established.Udi: (b)(4).
|
|
It was reported by netherlands that during service and evaluation, it was determined that the attachment device fell apart ¿ unattached.It was further observed that the cutter could not be inserted.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for visual assessment and cutter insertion assessment.It was noted in the service order that the device did not work at all.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The exact date of the event was unknown.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|