• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number APB-4-8-3D-SS
Medical Device Problem Code Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/15/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis #(b)(4).Equipment used: video inspection system ((b)(6)), ruler ((b)(6)), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5 as found condition: the axium prime coil was returned for analysis within a shipping box; within a sealed plastic biohazard pouch; within an opened axium prime inner pouch and within a dispenser coil.The unknown micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis.Visual inspection/damage location details: the axium prime pusher was found broken at the break indicator with the release wire and coin fully retracted out of the pusher.The proximal segment and release wire/coin were not returned for analysis.The axium prime pusher was found kinked at ~4.6cm and ~7.2cm from the proximal end.No damages or irregularities were found with the shield coil.The implant coil was already detached from the pusher.The implant coil was found damaged.Testing/analysis: the axium prime coil could not be used for resistance testing due to the damaged condition and due to the implant already detached.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck in catheter¿ was confirmed as the damages found is consistent with resistance.Possible causes for coil resistance in catheter are, but not limited to, lack of hydration before procedure, user does not maintain continuous flush, damage to the micro catheter, incompatible micro catheter, or tortuous anatomy.Customer reported patient vessel tortuosity as normal, and devices were prepared per ifu.The returned axium prime implant coil was found damaged, and the pusher was found kinked.Customer reported no issues and no resistance within the introducer sheath during preparation; therefore, it is possible the damages occurred during the attempt to push the coil into the micro catheter against the reported resistance.The break indicator was found broken and the coin was fully retracted out of the lumen stop, detaching the implant coil as expected by the detachment subassemblies.Customer did not report any detachment attempts.As the unknown micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis, any contribution of the micro catheter towards the resistance could not be determined.As the model and lot numbers were not reported, compatibility could not be assessed.Ngod10 (b)(6)2023.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received a report that the axium coil could not be pushed out.The axium was stuck in the middle portion of the catheter.Both the axium coil and the catheter were not damaged.The axium and any accessories were prepared as indicated in the instructions for use (ifu).No patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a saccular, ruptured ophthalmic artery aneurysm with a max diameter of 4mm and a 3.2mm neck diameter.It was noted the patient's blood flow was normal and vessel tortuosity was normal.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX  22570
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22570
MX   22570
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key18049708
Report Number9612164-2023-04978
Device Sequence Number12628788
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00847536038226
UDI-Public00847536038226
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K081465
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 11/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/17/2024
Device Model NumberAPB-4-8-3D-SS
Device Catalogue NumberAPB-4-8-3D-SS
Device Lot Number223322039
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/22/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 08/16/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/01/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/17/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-