| Model Number |
COMPR FT SCRW,2.5 MICRO, 50MM |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
09/08/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be determined as the device was not returned for evaluation.The root cause of the event could not be determined from the information available and without device evaluation.If the device becomes available for evaluation, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On 10/04/2023, it was reported by a patient's relative, via phone, that on (b)(6) 2023 the patient underwent a metacarpal fracture screw fixation when a screw snapped in half during insertion.The screw had to be burred down as it could not be removed.Burring the device down resulted in debris being produced.It took about an hour to irrigate the fragments from the patient.The patient's hand had to be cut open to continue with the procedure resulting in an extended recovery time.There was no additional information provided and additional information has been requested.Additional information was provided on 10/05/2023.It was reported that an ar-8725-50h micro compression ft broke during the procedure.Additional information was provided via phone on 10/31/2023: the wife of the patient advised that the facility will not provide any additional information regarding the case.She has asked for the surgeon to provide all the products that were used and they advised this information is not available.Per the wife, the surgeon stated the issue was with the implant and that a revision will not be performed, as the screw cannot be removed because the patient could experience loss of bone.Post-operative x-rays were taken and will be provided via email.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: g3, h3, h6.Based on the information provided which may include the device (if available and returned), pictures, videos, event description, and any additional information from the field, arthrex was able to conclude a most likely cause.The most likely cause for the reported failure can be attributed to user error of the device due to applying excessive mechanical forces and/or prying/leveraging the device during use.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|