MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA; CT LUCIA 602

Model Number	602
Medical Device Problem Codes	Off-Label Use (1494); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event	10/17/2023
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device cannot be returned as the customer stated that the device was disposed of by the clinic.Thus, a proper device analysis could not be completed, nor the reported issue confirmed.At this time, without a proper device analysis, a definitive root cause cannot be determined.However, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacturing, design, or labeling of the lens.It was stated by the customer that there was no damage noted to the device during preparation for use.It was stated by the customer that they are using the yamane technique to implant the lenses.This technique induces a larger amount of force while trying to position the haptics in the scleral tunnel.Our lenses are intended to be implanted in the capsular bag.Additionally, it was stated by the customer that they are using a "b" cartridge.Our lenses are intended to be used with zeiss specific accessory support devices.Thus, the lens was being used off-label.Based on the information provided, the risk assessment for the lucia product, and based on our experience we have determined that the following factors may have cause or contributed to the reported issue is but is not limited to: · lens placement technique · loading strategy · accessory device support · poor handling during folding and inserting the device history records were reviewed and there were no non-conformities or deviations noted during the manufacturing of the lens that would have caused or contributed to the nature of this complaint.Additionally, our lenses are 100% inspected before they leave our manufacturing site.Therefore, we are confident that the lens was processed per standard operating procedures and inspections and have met all criteria for release.
Event or Problem Description
The doctor attempted to implant ct lucia 602 +13.5d.It was reported that the lens was defective as both haptics broke.This iol was explanted and replaced with a backup zeiss lens during the same day without complication.

• Brand Name: CT LUCIA
• Common Device Name: CT LUCIA 602
• Manufacturer (Section D): CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC; 1040 s vintage ave. bld. a; ontario CA 91761
• Manufacturer (Section G): CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC; 1040 s vintage ave. bld. a; ontario CA 91761
• Manufacturer Contact: manjaya hegde ; 5300 central parkway; dublin, CA 94568 ; 9252164697
• MDR Report Key: 18070104
• Report Number: 3010126268-2023-00122
• Device Sequence Number: 15393418
• Product Code: HQL
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00843045100805
• UDI-Public: (01)00843045100805(17)270331
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: PA
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: P10016-S008
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2023
• Device Explanted Year: 2023
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): N
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Health Professional,Company Representative
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Nurse
• Type of Report: Initial
• Report Date (Section B): 11/03/2023

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Model Number: 602
• Device Catalogue Number: 003500-0050-659
• Device Lot Number: 3S220328
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 10/17/2023
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 11/03/2023
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 04/20/2022
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Required Intervention
• Patient Sex: Unknown