|
It was reported that, after a tka surgery had been performed in 2009, the post of the gii ps hi flex isrt sz 5-6 11 failed.This adverse event was solved by a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, in which a new insert was implanted.Current health status of patient is unknown.
|
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per case details, approximately fourteen (14) years after a total knee arthroplasty surgery was performed, the patient underwent a revision due the post of the gii ps hi flex isrt sz 5-6 11 failed was reportedly replaced with a new insert.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have definitively contributed to the event.The patient impact beyond the reported post insert failure and subsequent revision cannot be determined as no supporting documentation including the operative report is available.The patient¿s current health status was also not provided.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history based on the historical data revealed a similar event for the listed batch, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed that break of implant has been identified in warnings and precautions section as a result of strenuous activity or trauma.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According with inspection procedure, the final inspection includes the verification of part configuration per print.Also, per material specification, the quality and manufacture of polyethylene rod and plate shall be controlled.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include patient anatomy, abnormal loading of limb, excessive forces and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|