• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number AR40E
Medical Device Problem Codes Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse (1254); Failure to Fold (1255)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the haptic had folding issue and was unable to unfold.Iol was removed and replaced.No further information available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information cannot be provided due to personal data privacy legislation/policy section d6a: implant date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: explant date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section h3-other (81): it was indicated that the device is not returning for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Date returned to manufacturer: 06 march 2024.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection of the complaint lens revealed that one haptic was detached and missing.The lens was cleaned, and no further issues were observed.The photographs provided by the customer were evaluated and showed the original folding carton along with a 3-piece lens resting on a medical gauze.The lens appears to have bent/ damaged haptics that are resting across the optic of the lens.Due to the quality of the image, no further product evaluation can be performed.The complaint issue were not identified during product and photograph evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENSAR IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key18076668
Report Number3012236936-2023-02797
Device Sequence Number12685765
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474502079
UDI-Public(01)05050474502079(17)270717
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryMY
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberAR40E
Device Catalogue NumberAR40E00185
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/12/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/20/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/06/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/23/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/17/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-