| Model Number |
44-101 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Separation (1562); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
10/09/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The inari revcore was returned to the manufacturer and is pending evaluation.A follow-up report will be submitted once the findings are available.The device identifiers were provided, and the lot history records were reviewed.There were no discrepancies or unusual findings.Stent dislodgement/damage/entanglement is listed in the device labeling as a potential complication / adverse event.The device labeling also includes the following applicable warning statements: when revcore is in the path of an exposed stent with broken/fractured struts, a stent < 10 mm in diameter, or a stent compressed to < 10 mm, damage to the stent, the coring element, or dislodgment of the stent, etc.May occur.Proceed with caution when using revcore in or near a recently deployed stent.Avoid using excessive force to advance or retract against resistance.If excessive resistance is encountered, retract, and collapse the coring element into the outer catheter and remove the device.Excessive force against resistance may result in damage to the device or vessel.Manufacturer reference #: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A 67-year-old male patient with deep vein thrombosis (dvt) in the right lower extremity underwent a thrombectomy with the inari revcore thrombectomy system.The clot age was approximately 100 days.During the procedure, the revcore thrombectomy catheter became caught on a preexisting stent in the iliac vein.The revcore did not immediately come loose and excessive force was used to remove the device.Unfortunately, a segment of the stent moved with the device into the inferior vena cava.A second forceful withdrawal was performed which allowed the catheter to be removed.However, the nose cone was irretrievable and remains in the patient positioned between the old stent and the new covered stent.Postoperatively, the patient is doing well in stable condition.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Patient follow up with the physician was obtained shortly after the procedure and again several weeks later.The physician confirmed the patient was doing well and there has been no sequelae.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The remaining portion of the revcore thrombectomy catheter was returned to the manufacturer.The revcore was evaluated and was subjected to visual inspection.The distal end of the catheter was observed and no manufacturing defects were identified.No visible signs of stent struts were seen from the broken stent.Damage was observed to the proximal end of the middle and inner shafts with the shafts being heavily kinked.These findings are consistent with the event description reported in the initial mdr.It was concluded that during use the revcore element inadvertently became engaged with a preexisting implanted stent at an overlapping stent region.The physician failed to follow disengagement training/instructions which led to a dislodgement of a portion of the stent (use error).While retracting the device, the distal tip was caught up in the stent and excessive force led to a weaking of the distal tip and ultimate separation of the distal tip from the inner shaft of the device.The kinked shaft was most likely a result of packaging/transportation for product return and is not reflective of a product defect.Manufacturer reference #: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|