• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIDENT 0 DEG CONSTRAINED INSERT 28F; PROSTHESIS, HIP, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED OR UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIDENT 0 DEG CONSTRAINED INSERT 28F; PROSTHESIS, HIP, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED OR UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 690-00-28F
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Joint Dislocation (2374); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Date of Event 03/07/2011
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding disassociation involving a trident liner was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional, and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: the event descriptions from the product inquiry summaries state: it was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly the patient was implanted with and lfit anatomic cocr v40 femoral head on his right hip on or about (b)(6) 2008 and was revised on (b)(6) 2011.It is further alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of implantation and explantation of the device at issue, device recall and excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood.Additional information as per medical records received oct-16-2023: "the hip was noted to be dislocated.The femoral head was removed.This was followed by removal of a dissociated constrained liner.Constrained liner was dissociated from the head as well as the cup." the operative report dated brief operative report and sticker sheet from (b)(6) 2011 denote that in the revision tha performed on the acetabular liner was exchanged for a constrained liner.The operative report from a revision tha performed om (b)(6) 2017 describes that the constrained liner had dissociated from the acetabular shell, the head remained within the constrained liner.The constrained liner was revised to an adm liner that was cemented in to a well fixed protrusio cup and the head exchanged.The documentation provided confirms that a primary tha was revised for instability on (b)(6) 2011.A second revision tha surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2017 for dissociation of a constrained liner.No documentation was available to confirm excess levels of cobalt and chromium in the blood.The root cause of these tha failures cannot be determined from the limited documentation provided.Should additional information become available i would be happy to further this assessment." device history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood, as per medical records received "constrained liner was dissociated from the head as well as the cup." a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: the event descriptions from the product inquiry summaries state: it was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly the patient was implanted with and lfit anatomic cocr v40 femoral head on his right hip on or about (b)(6) 2008 and was revised on (b)(6) 2011.It is further alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of implantation and explantation of the device at issue, device recall and excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood.Additional information as per medical records received oct-16-2023: "the hip was noted to be dislocated.The femoral head was removed.This was followed by removal of a dissociated constrained liner.Constrained liner was dissociated from the head as well as the cup." the operative report dated brief operative report and sticker sheet from (b)(6) 2011 denote that in the revision tha performed on the acetabular liner was exchanged for a constrained liner.The operative report from a revision tha performed om (b)(6) 2017 describes that the constrained liner had dissociated from the acetabular shell, the head remained within the constrained liner.The constrained liner was revised to an adm liner that was cemented in to a well fixed protrusio cup and the head exchanged.The documentation provided confirms that a primary tha was revised for instability on (b)(6) 2011.A second revision tha surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2017 for dissociation of a constrained liner.No documentation was available to confirm excess levels of cobalt and chromium in the blood.The root cause of these tha failures cannot be determined from the limited documentation provided.Should additional information become available i would be happy to further this assessment.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as return of the device, pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the revision operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly the patient was implanted with and lfit anatomic cocr v40 femoral head on his right hip on or about (b)(6) 2008 and was revised on (b)(6) 2011.It is further alleged that he suffered injuries as a result of implantation and explantation of the device at issue, device recall and excessive levels of chromium and cobalt in his blood.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIDENT 0 DEG CONSTRAINED INSERT 28F
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED OR UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
anna ryan
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
61498200
MDR Report Key18089237
Report Number0002249697-2023-01353
Device Sequence Number6254227
Product Code KWZ
UDI-Device Identifier07613327025552
UDI-Public07613327025552
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNY
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K061654
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2008
Device Explanted Year2011
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 11/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2010
Device Catalogue Number690-00-28F
Device Lot NumberE3JMHE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/16/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/01/2005
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-