| Catalog Number |
72204045 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/12/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a tibial retrograde tunnel surgery, the distal end of the 9.5mm retrograde drill bit remained in the tibial tunnel, and the drill bit was recovered from the patient.The procedure was completed with non-significant delay using a s+n back up device.Antibiotic therapy was started and no further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a tibial retrograde tunnel surgery, the distal end of the 9.5mm retrograde drill bit remained in the tibial tunnel, and the drill bit was recovered from the patient.The procedure was completed without surgical delay using a s+n back up device in the originally drilled bone hole.Antibiotic therapy was started, and no further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: h2: additional information: a2, a3, a4, b1, b2, b5.Corrected data: h1, h6: health effect - impact code.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6 (health effect - impact code) updated.H3, h6: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not returned for evaluation.Insufficient product identification information was provided and thus a manufacturing record review could not be conducted.Based on the information available, there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation updated: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not returned for evaluation.Insufficient product identification information was provided and thus a manufacturing record review could not be conducted.Based on the information available, there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: h2: additional information: d4: lot number and exp date.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6 type of investigation codes updated.Investigation updated: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not received for evaluation.A processing error at the courier prevented the product return.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|