• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER; DQY, QJP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER; DQY, QJP Back to Search Results
Catalog Number BMK6F105BER130
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/19/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the left internal carotid artery (ica) using a benchmark 6f 071 delivery catheter (benchmark), a non-penumbra select catheter, a non-penumbra sheath and a guidewire.During the procedure, the physician placed the benchmark in the target vessel with the guidewire and select catheter.Upon removing the select catheter, the physician noticed that the benchmark appeared to be unwinding.Therefore, the physician was able to manually pull and removed the benchmark successfully.The procedure was completed using a new benchmark and the same sheath.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned benchmark confirmed coil winds were exposed coming out of the hub.Evaluation revealed that a coil wind may have been exposed within the hub.Manipulation of a device within the benchmark may cause the exposed coil wind to start unraveling.The root cause of the coil wind becoming exposed could not be determined.Penumbra devices are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following sections were inadvertently missed on the follow-up #01 and are being included on this follow-up #02 mfr report:3005168196-2023-00509.1.Section h.Box 6.Conclusions code 1.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section was incorrectly reported on the initial mfr report and is being corrected on this follow-up #03 mfr report:3005168196-2023-00509.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BENCHMARK 6F 071 DELIVERY CATHETER
Common Device Name
DQY, QJP
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key18120372
Report Number3005168196-2023-00509
Device Sequence Number7512694
Product Code DQY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948025226
UDI-Public00815948025226
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWV
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K212838
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/13/2024
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2026
Device Catalogue NumberBMK6F105BER130
Device Lot NumberF00007750
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/23/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/19/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/14/2023
01/14/2005
01/14/2005
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/13/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/07/2023
04/18/2024
06/13/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age48 YR
Patient SexMale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-