| Catalog Number |
050-87215 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Peritonitis (2252)
|
| Date of Event |
10/20/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Clinical review: there is a temporal relationship between peritoneal dialysis therapy utilizing the liberty select cycler with liberty cycler set and the patient event of peritonitis.However, there is no documentation in the complaint file to show a causal relationship between the adverse event and use of the liberty select cycler or cycler set.Additionally, there is no allegation of a device malfunction or deficiency, or cycler set defect reported for the peritonitis event.Although no information was provided related to culture results or the determined cause of the peritonitis, all pd patients are at risk of peritonitis due to a compromised immune system and the increase of potential for microbial contamination from dialysis techniques.Most cases of peritonitis are caused by touch contamination by the patient with the pd catheter being a source of entry for organisms into the peritoneum.Based on the limited information and no allegation or evidence of a malfunction, deficiency, or defect the liberty select cycler and cycler set can be excluded as the cause of the patient¿s reported peritonitis event.The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A peritoneal dialysis registered nurse (pdrn) reported that a peritoneal dialysis (pd) patient was diagnosed with an infection on pd catheter (not a fresenius product).Additional information was obtained through follow-up with the pdrn.The patient went to the emergency room (er) on (b)(6) 2023.No symptoms were provided.The patient was diagnosed with peritonitis.It was confirmed this was not a pd catheter infection.The patient was initiated on antibiotic therapy with intraperitoneal (ip) vancomycin and ceftazidime (dose, frequency, and duration not provided).No culture results were available.The patient¿s hospital records have not been received by the clinic.The clinic has not been able to obtain information from the patient, who has been difficult to get in touch with since the er visit.The patient is reportedly not completing pd treatments.The patient stated the hospital instructed her not to complete pd treatments.The pdrn stated the hospital would not instruct the patient to withhold dialysis.The patient has a history of non-compliance with treatments.Therefore, it is unknown if the patient is compliant with the antibiotic therapy.The cause of the peritonitis has not been confirmed due to the culture results not being available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A peritoneal dialysis registered nurse (pdrn) reported that a peritoneal dialysis (pd) patient was diagnosed with an infection on pd catheter (not a fresenius product).Additional information was obtained through follow-up with the pdrn.The patient went to the emergency room (er) on (b)(6) 2023.No symptoms were provided.The patient was diagnosed with peritonitis.It was confirmed this was not a pd catheter infection.The patient was initiated on antibiotic therapy with intraperitoneal (ip) vancomycin and ceftazidime (dose, frequency, and duration not provided).No culture results were available.The patient¿s hospital records have not been received by the clinic.The clinic has not been able to obtain information from the patient, who has been difficult to get in touch with since the er visit.The patient is reportedly not completing pd treatments.The patient stated the hospital instructed her not to complete pd treatments.The pdrn stated the hospital would not instruct the patient to withhold dialysis.The patient has a history of non-compliance with treatments.Therefore, it is unknown if the patient is compliant with the antibiotic therapy.The cause of the peritonitis has not been confirmed due to the culture results not being available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Plant investigation: the sample was not returned to the manufacturer and the lot number was not provided.A manufacturing review was performed on the products shipped to the patient for the three (3) month time frame which immediately preceded the event occurrence date.This review included the lot numbers for all fresenius liberty cycler sets shipped to this account within the selected time frame.The entire set of lots have been sold and distributed.There were no non-conformances or abnormalities identified during the manufacturing process which could be associated with the reported event.An investigation of the device history records (dhr) was conducted and confirmed that the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The product lots involved met all specifications for release.A review of the dhr did not reveal a probable cause for the customer complaint.As a physical evaluation could not be performed, a definitive conclusion regarding the reported incident could not be reached and a cause could not be confirmed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|