| Catalog Number |
222581 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Inflammation (1932); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
| Date of Event |
08/03/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: ((b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).It was reported by a healthcare professional through clinical research that during a rotator cuff repair procedure of the right shoulder on (b)(6) 2022 due to a recurrent rotator cuff tear with severe bicipital tenosynovitis, a 4.75 healix advance kntls br device and a 4.5hlx adv br anc-dyna 3-sut device were used.According to the report, a shoulder arthroscopy with revision rotator cuff repair was performed on (b)(6) 2023 with a double row approach with multiple lock sutures.It was further reported that the revision procedure included an arthroscopic limited debridement including removal of retained and previous suture material.The status of the patient was unknown.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The complaint device is not being returned, it was retained by the customer, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.Since the complaint device was not returned, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device, and no non-conformance was identified.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H6: health codes added.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: b5: additional information was received on 17 apr 2024: there was a re-operation/revision event details: event date: (b)(6) 2023 alert date: (b)(6) 2024 event occurred country of event: united states procedure 1: rotator cuff repair date of surgery: (b)(6)2022 patient details patient identifier: male age (at time of consent): 55 years operative side: right surgeon first name: paul surgeon last name: favorito was the fms vue ii system used for this procedure? : no was the vapr system used for this procedure? : no was the speedtrap graft preparation system used for this procedure? : no additional event details re-op/revision procedure - other, specify 1: shoulder arthroscopy with revision rotator cuff repair with a double row approach with multiple lock sutures.Arthroscopic limited debridement including removal of retained and previous suture material re-op/revision procedure 2: other re-op/revision procedure - other, specify 2: debridement of the superior labrum and revision release of adhesions from the subacromial space re-op/revision procedure 3: biceps tenodesis re-op/revision procedure - other, specify 3: unknown was the fms vue ii system used for this procedure? : value "blank" has been changed to "no" was the speedtrap graft preparation system used for this procedure? : value "blank" has been changed to "no" was the vapr system used for this procedure? : value "blank" has been changed to "no".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: during further follow up the reporter mentioned that the "right shoulder recurrent rotator cuff tear, severe bicipital tenosynovitis." has been changed to "right shoulder recurrent rotator cuff tear".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|