|
It was reported that, a plaintiff underwent a left intertan femoral nail procedure, on (b)(6) 2023, due to a fall and subsequent sub trochanteric fracture.They later developed a varus deformity and were diagnosed with a sub trochanteric / intertrochanteric femur nonunion with failed fixation, and the intertan 1.5 11.5mmx38cm 125d lt nail and the lag/comp screw kit 90/85 were found to be fractured.Therefore, they were elected for a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, in which the nail was explanted and a synthes competitor device was implanted.Patient was taken to pacu in stable condition, no other complications were reported.
|
|
H3, h6: although the involvement of all the devices was reported, the relationship with the investigated failure was directly associated to the lag compression screw kit.The associated device was returned and evaluated.The visual inspection revealed that the intertan nail fracture into two pieces and one of the screws fractured into two pieces as well.The visual also reveals signs of wear on the other screws that were returned.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the information provided the clinical root cause of the reported nail breakage and subsequent deformity and revision is the nonunion femur fracture with failed fixation in the presence of poor bone quality which was noted during the initial device implantation surgery.Additionally, adequate bone blood supply and vascularization is integral to proper bone healing and successful implantation outcome.The impact to the patient is the explantation of the smith and nephew intertan nail and screws components and revision of the non-union with a competitor¿s device(s).The patient¿s current health status is unknown.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A laboratory analysis performed on the device revealed that based on this investigation, it was concluded that the trigen intertan nail fractured by the initiation and subsequent propagation of fatigue cracking.The fatigue cracking eventually propagated to an extent that the remaining cross section could not bear the imposed patient loading, which led to a fracture.Fatigue cracking is caused by the nail bearing cyclic stresses in excess of the material endurance limit for an extended period.These excessive cyclic stresses may be caused by any number of conditions, including but not limited to excessive patient activity levels prior to full bone union applications of loads in excess of the material¿s strength, or poor bone quality.The compression screw was fractured.It is not clear if this fracture occurred before, during, or after the nail fracture.A review of complaint history revealed a similar event for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the instructions for use documents for intramedullary nail system revealed in possible adverse effects that cracking or fracture of the implant may occur.Preoperative planning section states that proper type and size of implant must be selected to ensure effective treatment of patients considering factors such as patient¿s size, strength, skeletal characteristics, skeletal health, and general health.Overweight or musculoskeletal deficient or unhealthy patients may create greater loads on implants that may lead to breakage or other failure of the implants.Additionally, postoperative care section warns that early weight bearing substantially increases implant loading and increases the risk of breaking the device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According with the inspection procedure, the final inspection includes the verification of part configuration per print.Also, per material specification, the quality and manufacture of standard grade titanium, aluminum and vanadium alloy shall be controlled.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.Corrected data: e1 (initial reporter name and address).
|