• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION HARMONY DELIVERY CATHETER SYSTEM; PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELI

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION HARMONY DELIVERY CATHETER SYSTEM; PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELI Back to Search Results
Model Number HARMONY-DCS
Medical Device Problem Codes Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008); Intravalvular regurgitation (4068)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Cusp Tear (2656); Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4453); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/16/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received information that during the implant of this transcatheter pulmonary bioprosthetic valve, the patient had a tricuspid tear when the coil of the delivery catheter system (dcs) was going back into the sheath.Patient experienced moderate tricuspid regurgitation after the incident.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: section d information references the main component of the system.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: harmony-25, serial/lot #: (b)(6), ubd: (b)(6) 2024, udi#: (b)(4).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information was received that per the physician, the cause of the regurgitation was due to the pulling of the coil into the dcs, and the non-medtronic sheath was near a chordal attachment causing the tear.Per the physician, the dcs caused/contributed to the tear.It was further reported that treatment was not provided for the tear, and the patient¿s symptoms were improving.Per the physician, the distance from the tricuspid valve to pulmonary valve was shorter than normal, which contributed to the tear.Additionally, it was noted that the patient had mild tricuspid regurgitation prior to implant, and the flailed tricuspid chordae tendineae was not present prior to implant.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information was received that at the time of the procedure, the physician thought both the dcs, and non-medtronic sheath were clear of the tricuspid valve, and tricuspid valve chordae tendineae.When looking at the angiogram¿s post-procedure, the physician concluded that the chordae was likely caught in between the dcs and sheath.This was concluded to be because the right ventricular outflow tract was shorter than it was thought to be.Per the physician, the valve did not cause or contribute to the tear.Additionally, the patient did not have any reported symptoms, only increasing regurgitation that showed slight improvement on the echocardiograms the following day.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information received shows that there is no information to reasonably suggest that valve serial number (b)(6) in this report may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or that the valve in this report has malfunctioned.Therefore, this event did not and does not meet the reporting requirements for the valve stipulated in 21 cfr 803.Updated data: b5.H6.The codes present in section h6 correspond to multiple components/products that comprise this reported event.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Image review: two transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) video clips were provided for review.Mobile echogenic structure was seen on the tricuspid valve.A possible torn chordae was observed.Moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation seen with color doppler.Updated: h6.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HARMONY DELIVERY CATHETER SYSTEM
Common Device Name
PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELI
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key18192180
Report Number2025587-2023-04882
Device Sequence Number7275417
Product Code NPV
UDI-Device Identifier00763000341367
UDI-Public00763000341367
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P200046
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/29/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/29/2024
Device Model NumberHARMONY-DCS
Device Catalogue NumberHARMONY-DCS
Device Lot Number0011710204
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/16/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/11/2023
12/29/2023
02/28/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/22/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/19/2023
01/05/2024
02/29/2024
Date Device Manufactured03/30/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight99 KG
-
-