|
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE FLEX W/SHIELD TECHNOLOGY; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
PED2-500-10 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Activation Failure (3270); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Visual Disturbances (2140); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/20/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medtronic received a report that the healthcare provider (hcp) attempted to implant this first pipeline.The distal end of the device would not open.Hcp tried resheathing the ptfe sleeves multiple times and it still would not open.The middle part of the pipeline was positioned in a bend.Less than 50% of the pipeline had been deployed when it failed to open.The pipeline was resheathed less than or equal to two times.There were no additional steps or other devices required to open the pipeline.Hcp withdrew the device from the patient and went with the next device.The hcp tried to tried to deploy the second pipeline and failed due to the device not opening correctly proximally and the device looked damaged, possibly from resheathing, so the hcp removed and went for a third device.More than 50% of the second pipeline had been deployed when it failed to open.The middle portion of the pipeline was position ed in a bend.The pipeline was resheathed less than or equal to two times.There were no additional steps or other devices required to open the pipeline.The hcp attempted a third pipeline and it would also not open properly proximally.More than 50% of the third pipeline had been deployed when it failed to open.The middle portion of the pipeline was positioned in a bend.The pipeline was resheathed less than or equal to two times.There were no additional steps or other devices required to open the pipeline.The pipelines were used for an approved indication.The devices and any accessories were prepared as indicated in the ifu. all 3 pipelines were removed safely from the patient and discarded.The doctor chose to use a different flow diverter.Bovine arch made access difficult.The patient also had very tortuous anatomy, making the pipeline deployment extremely difficult.No patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a saccular, unruptured left internal carotid artery (ica) opthalmic region aneurysm.The landing zone was 4.6mm distally and 4mm proximally.It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was severe.Ancillary devices include a cerebase long sheath, 95cm,.090 sheath, navien.058 x 125cm guide catheter, phenom 27 x 150cm microcatheter, aristotle 24 x 200cm guidewire.Refer to manufacturer report 2029214-2023-02272 and 2029214-2023-02273 for related events.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Refer to manufacturer report 2029214-2023-02272 and 2029214-2023-02273 for related events.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was received that the doctor noted that there was "no, not really" any resistance.It was noted that the patient was doing well and a fred flow diverter was used after not being able to use pipeline.They needed tpa for visual complaints, but that is resolved.Ancillary devices included phenom 27, ref #(b)(4), lot #226258434, phenom 27, ref #(b)(4), lot #226624220.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|