| Model Number |
PM697R |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
09/19/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to aesculap inc.That a jaw ins.Metz sciss.Insul to tip 5/310mm (part # pm697r) was used during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2023.According to the complainant, during the surgery, the internal component of the scissor broke off.The device fragment fell into the patient and was removed with a grasper.An x-ray was performed, which confirmed that no fragments remained inside the patient.No patient complications or surgical delays were reported as a result of this event.The adverse event is filed under aic reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation on-going.Should relevant additional information / investigation results become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation results: investigator carried out the pictorial documentation visually and microscopically.The joint on one of the two scissor parts is broken and the pin connecting the two joints is missing.Device history review: based on the production date of february 2016, we were able to identify two batches for this period.This concerns the batches (b)(6).The device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for all available lot numbers and the products found to be according to our specification valid at the time of production.There are no similar complaints against the same lot number(s) with this error pattern.According to manufacturer's reporting evaluation in accordance with 21 cfr 803, this event is considered reportable for the following reason: - serious injury (report not later than 30 days).The reporting decision is based upon the review of the applicable risk analysis.Conclusion/preventive measures: due to the small dimension/diameter of the device, a detailed fracture surface analysis is difficult.Due to that circumstance, there are no clear hints regarding arrest lines.Based upon the investigation results, a clear root cause conclusion cannot be determined.Based upon the investigation results, a capa is not necessary.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|