• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN XT TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN XT TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9300TFX23A
Medical Device Problem Codes Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Dyspnea (1816)
Date of Event 03/09/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
As reported by compassion clinical study, post tpvr procedure with a 23mm sapien 3 xt valve, the patient presented to the hospital with chest pain, and echo report revealed right heart dysfunction along with moderate stenosis and insufficiency.The valve was explanted.Per report, moderate residual regurgitation was observed following pulmonary valve intervention.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is still ongoing.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The event reported is anticipated in the risk management documentation for transcatheter heart valve procedures.A previous investigation into this type of event is captured in an edwards lifesciences technical summary and applies to this complaint.Additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The device was not returned for evaluation.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.The ifu, current risk mitigations include design and manufacturing controls, and training manuals have been reviewed, no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Per the valve academic research consortium (varc), valve stenosis can result from several factors, including pannus, calcification, support structure deformation (out of round configuration), trauma (cardia pulmonary resuscitation, blunt chest trauma), endocarditis, prosthetic valve thrombosis, and native leaflet prolapse impeding prosthetic leaflet motion.Stenosis of an implanted valve may be a manifestation of structural valve deterioration (svd).This term refers to changes intrinsic to the valve, and can include failure modes such as wear, calcification, leaflet tear, stent creep, leaflet disruption, or leaflet retraction.Svd may be mild and not require any intervention or it may be moderate to severe.It can cause the heart to work harder to eject blood from the ventricle.Depending on severity it could be an indication for valve replacement or medical intervention.Due to insufficient information, a definitive root cause is unable to be determined.Per the instructions for use (ifu), valve regurgitation is a known potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter valve replacement (thv) procedure.In this case, the patient had stenosis which can in turn interfere with normal coaptation functionality of the device by restricting the leaflet motion, and thus, resulting in central regurgitation.In this case, the patient had stenosis, which could have suboptimal leaflets coaptation leading to valve regurgitation.As such, available information suggests that patient factors (stenosis) may have contributed to the complaint event.In this case, the stenosis and regurgitation were confirmed by records received.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN XT TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Common Device Name
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key18195028
Report Number2015691-2023-17688
Device Sequence Number20443001
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103192070
UDI-Public(01)00690103192070(17)210308
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P130009
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2019
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/09/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/08/2021
Device Model Number9300TFX23A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/30/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/03/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/22/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/09/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/23/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age17 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-