|
Reportable on analysis completed on 30oct2023.It was reported that the catheter funnel was difficult to expand.A 12mm wolf venous catheter was selected for use in a thrombectomy procedure.The 12mm wolf catheter was prepped and delivered through the wolf sheath.It was observed the wolf funnel could not fully deploy due to oversizing.It was at this point they realized they should have chosen an 8mm funnel.During removal of the wolf catheter, there was force created from the oversizing and compressed the end of the wolf sheath.The wolf catheter and sheath were successfully removed with no harm to the patient.A new wolf sheath was inserted successfully, and an 8mm funnel wolf catheter was utilized in the same anatomy successfully without any issues.As the thrombectomy progressed into a larger venous anatomy (proximal femoral artery) it was observed a larger funnel wolf catheter may be beneficial to use in this proximal anatomy.A second 12mm funnel wolf catheter was decided to be prepped and used in the proximal femoral and common femoral.The second 12mm funnel wolf catheter was prepped and advanced through the wolf sheath successfully.While deploying the 12mm funnel on the wolf catheter, it was again observed the decision on the size may be too large.They then suggested to remove the 12mm funnel.Due to oversizing the second time, the 12mm funnel required force to pull the sleeve into the sheath.This caused the tip of the sheath to compress and the 12mm funnel sleeve to break.The 12mm funnel wolf catheter, sleeve and wolf sheath were all able to be removed from the patient easily with no harm to the patient.However, device analysis revealed the coating had flaked off on the catheter.
|
|
Device eval by mfr: the catheter was returned within the sheath, and the funnel was deployed within the sleeve.The sleeve was able to be removed from the catheter, and the catheter was removed from the sheath for decontamination.The wolf catheter was examined for visual abnormalities.It was found that the sleeve was significantly damaged approximately 6-10cm between the distal end of the devortex shaft and the proximal end of the sleeve.It is possible that the damage occurred because of the force reported by the site that was encountered during device removal.It was also found that the marker band coating approximately 68cm from the strain relief was flaking off of the catheter.There were no visual abnormalities noted to the sheath.The wolf catheter was reloaded with a new sleeve and inserted into the returned sheath.The catheter funnel was able to be deployed out of the end of the sheath and a successful sleeve pull was performed.The reported events of failure to expand and difficulty removing were unable to be confirmed.
|