• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL OBT_BUTTON_4.0,167CW_MITEK; ACCESSORIES, ARTHROSCOPIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL OBT_BUTTON_4.0,167CW_MITEK; ACCESSORIES, ARTHROSCOPIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 242258
Medical Device Problem Code Material Deformation (2976)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/14/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: as of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.(b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).It was reported by the healthcare professional that on 11/14/2023, it was observed that the hd arthroscope/sinuscope 4.0mm x 30 deg x 167mm (mitek lock) device was cloudy and the obturator with button top for 5.9mm sheath 167mm (mitek lock) device was bent.It was unknown whether the event occurred during surgery.However, it was reported that there was no patient involvement.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.The product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Visual inspections revealed that the surface of the device and the tip shows wear marks and deformed condition indicating that heavily use.The obturator was tried to disassemble and assembled of the dual sheath, there was a resistance, and it was difficult to dissemble; the condition of the shaft might have contributed to this issue.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device, and no non-conformances were identified.Based on the visual inspection of the device, this complaint can be confirmed.The possible root cause for the reported failure can be related when the device might have been dropped or device was tapped against a hard surface accidentally, as well as rough use by the user; moreover, this failure reported can be related to the wear and tear of the device.As per ifu, do not use a damaged or defective endoscope.Inspect the endoscope prior to each examination or procedure and before sterilization based on the instructions in this document; it is important to check the shaft for bending, scratches, dents, corrosion, pitting, or other surface irregularities.Do not hold the endoscope by its shaft; this may cause damage and do not bend the endoscope or subject the endoscope to impact.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OBT_BUTTON_4.0,167CW_MITEK
Common Device Name
ACCESSORIES, ARTHROSCOPIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle CH-24 00
SZ   CH-2400
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key18220478
Report Number1221934-2023-04295
Device Sequence Number5788165
Product Code NBH
UDI-Device Identifier10886705029174
UDI-Public10886705029174
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateVA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/28/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number242258
Device Lot Number1530729
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/12/2023
01/04/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/28/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/18/2023
01/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/06/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-