|
|
| Catalog Number |
0117310 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
08/03/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax on (b)(6) 2021.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is alleged that the patient had revision surgery on 03-aug-2023.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax on (b)(6)2021.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is alleged that the patient had revision surgery on (b)(6)2023.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided:
(b)(6)2021 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of 3dmax light mesh (device 1).Per op notes, ¿the left inguinal hernia was dissected out.A 3dmax light mesh (device 1) was placed and secured to the pubic tubercle using tacks.¿
(b)(6)2023 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent robotic repair with the removal of mesh (device 1) and implant of 3dmax light meshes (device 2, 3).Per op notes, ¿on left, the mesh was visualized beneath the peritoneum.The mesh was left insitu and scar tissue was noted.Adhesions were lysed.A left direct inguinal hernia was noted and the mesh (device 1) was removed.A medium 3dmax light mesh (device 2) was placed into preperitoneal space and positioned along the cooper ligament.On right side, indirect inguinal hernia was noted.A 3dmax light mesh (device 3) was placed and secured to cooper ligament using sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum:
h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct the brand name and 510(k).Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-may-2021) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot.No., udi no., expiry date), d.6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10, h11.Corrected fields: d1, g4.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|