|
|
| Catalog Number |
0115320 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
06/16/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax on (b)(6) 2017.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax.Attorney alleges that the patient had revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-dec-2016) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b4, b5, b7, d4, g1, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol 3dmax on (b)(6) 2017.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the 3dmax.Attorney alleges that the patient had revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with reducible right direct inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of 3dmax mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿a 3dmax mesh (device #1) was placed and secured by sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2023 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia thereby underwent repair robotic assisted laparoscopic repair with the implant of 3dmax mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿the previous 3dmax mesh (device #1) was displaced.Adhesions were removed.A 3dmax mesh (device #2) was placed and secured by sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|